Paper · 2011 · Weed Research

The cure model: an improved way to describe seed germination?

A ONOFRI; M B MESGARAN; F TEI; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

O nofri A, M esgaran MB, T ei F & C ousens RD (2011). The cure model: an improved way to describe seed germination? Weed Research 51 , 516–524. Summary Traditional methods of data analysis ( anova and linear/non‐linear regression) may often not be appropriate for datasets resulting from seed germination/emergence assays. One major problem is that they take the form of ‘time to event’ data with censoring, i.e. the event is only known to have occurred within an interval of time. Parametric survival models have, therefore, been proposed as appropriate alternatives. These, in turn, have the disadvantage that they assume that all the seeds will germinate at some future time, conflicting with the fact that a proportion of ungerminated viable seeds is frequently observed at the end of an experiment. The ‘cure’ model, which we present here, has been used in cancer research as an extension to parametric survival models, to account for a final fraction of individuals that is cured from the disease under study and will not die because of that cause. We show that the ‘cure’ model holds the potential to be used successfully in germination assays, as an extension to non‐linear regression and conventional accelerated failure time (AFT) models, with several logical improvements in terms of distributional assumptions and censoring. By way of selected examples, it is shown that the ‘cure’ model can separate the effect of factors/covariates on germination capacity (final germination percentage) from that on germination velocity (germination rate) and uniformity (synchrony of germination), which may represent an advantage from a biological point of view.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cure model separates the effect of factors on germination capacity (final germination percentage) from the effect on germination velocity (germination rate) and uniformity.

Outcome
effect of factors/covariates on germination capacity (final germination percentage)e1
Comparator
germination velocity (germination rate)e1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“can separate the effect of factors/covariates on germination capacity (final germination percentage) from that on germination velocity (germination rate) and uniformity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1568 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The cure model holds the potential to be used successfully in germination assays, as an extension to conventional accelerated failure time (AFT) models.

Outcome
holds the potential to be used successfully in germination assayse2
Comparator
conventional accelerated failure time (AFT) modelse3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e2

“holds the potential to be used successfully in germination assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1150 · show in text ↑
e3

“conventional accelerated failure time (AFT) models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1247 · show in text ↑