Abstract
Abstract In arid environments, direct facilitation (microhabitat amelioration) and indirect facilitation (‘associational resistance’ via protection from herbivory) among plants of different species may act simultaneously. Little is known about their relative effects. One way to disentangle the effects is by evaluating spatial associations. We examined the relative importance of these two mechanisms of facilitation in the semiarid C haco vegetation of north‐central A rgentina, through an eight‐way observational study in which we quantified the degree of spatial association between saplings of each of two key tree species, S chinopsis lorentzii ( A nacardiaceae) and A spidosperma quebracho‐blanco ( A pocynaceae), with shrub neighbours either possessing spines or without spines and in both an ungrazed site and a site with a long history of cattle grazing. We analysed data across 400 subparcels at each site with spatial analysis by distance indices. Saplings of both tree species showed positive spatial associations with spiny shrubs in the grazed site but not in the ungrazed site, and never with non‐spiny shrubs. This result suggests that spiny shrubs may indeed provide associational resistance for saplings of key tree species in grazed habitats in these dry subtropical forests, that is, that indirect facilitation may predominate over direct facilitation. If confirmed by experimental studies, this result can have implications for the silvopastoral management of rapidly expanding ranches in the semiarid C haco, where current practice includes the near elimination of native shrubs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
S chinopsis lorentzii saplings were positively associated with spiny shrubs in the grazed site.
Verbatim
e0“Saplings of both tree species showed positive spatial associations with spiny shrubs in the grazed site but not in the ungrazed site, and never with non‐spiny shrubs”
t0“woody plants”
t1“S chinopsis lorentzii”
Claim · model-written summary
A spidosperma quebracho‐blanco saplings were positively associated with spiny shrubs in the grazed site.
Verbatim
e0“Saplings of both tree species showed positive spatial associations with spiny shrubs in the grazed site but not in the ungrazed site, and never with non‐spiny shrubs”
t0“woody plants”
t1“A spidosperma quebracho‐blanco”
Claim · model-written summary
Tree saplings were not positively associated with spiny shrubs at the ungrazed site.
Verbatim
e0“Saplings of both tree species showed positive spatial associations with spiny shrubs in the grazed site but not in the ungrazed site”
t0“woody plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Tree saplings were never associated with non-spiny shrubs.
Verbatim
e0“Saplings of both tree species showed positive spatial associations with spiny shrubs in the grazed site but not in the ungrazed site, and never with non‐spiny shrubs”
t0“woody plants”