Paper · 2012 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

The effects of different tillage methods on the post-wheat second crop sesame: seed yield, energy budget, and economic return

BÜLENT UZUN; ENGİN YOL; ŞEYMUS FURAT; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out to assess the effects of different tillage practices on second crop sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) after wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) during the growing seasons of 2008 and 2009 in Aksu, Antalya, Turkey. The experimental design included no-till sowing into wet soil (NTW), no-till sowing into dry soil (NTD), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) with 3 registered sesame cultivars, Muganli-57, Gölmarmara, and Özberk. In the no-till methods, the field was passed over only once for planting, which was directly performed into soil with stubble. In the RT method, the soil was not inverted and the field was tilled only once with a powered rotary tiller. The CT method consisted of 1-time moldboard plowing and 2-time disc harrowing, and leveling. According to the seed yield means of 2 years, the RT method provided the highest yield with a value of 855.2 kg ha^{-1}, while the lowest yield was recorded for NTW with a value of 413.0 kg ha^{-1}. Statistically, the RT and CT methods produced higher yields than the no-till methods. In addition to seed yield, days to 50% flowering, stem length to the first capsule, plant height, number of capsules per plant, and number of seeds per capsule were positively affected by the RT and CT methods. As expected, the no-till methods resulted in significantly less fuel consumption, with 7.5 L ha^{-1}, than RT (26.4 L ha^{-1}) and CT (71.5 L ha^{-1}). Although the no-till methods provided higher energy savings and lower land preparation costs, they fell behind RT and CT in regard to seed yield. When fuel consumption, inputs, and seed yield were considered together, the RT method was the most economical. Therefore, the RT method was advised to farmers for second crop sesame after wheat with the highest income potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage had the highest mean sesame seed yield over two years, 855.2 kg ha^{-1}.

Treatment
RT methode0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
855.2 kg ha^{-1}e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RT method provided the highest yield with a value of 855.2 kg ha^{-1}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till sowing into wet soil had the lowest mean sesame seed yield over two years, 413.0 kg ha^{-1}.

Treatment
NTWe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
413.0 kg ha^{-1}e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest yield was recorded for NTW with a value of 413.0 kg ha^{-1}”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and conventional tillage produced higher sesame seed yields than no-till methods.

Treatment
RT and CT methodse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the no-till methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Statistically, the RT and CT methods produced higher yields than the no-till methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and conventional tillage positively affected days to 50% flowering, stem length to the first capsule, and plant height.

Treatment
RT and CT methodse0
Outcome
days to 50% flowering, stem length to the first capsule, plant heighte0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days to 50% flowering, stem length to the first capsule, plant height, number of capsules per plant, and number of seeds per capsule were positively affected by the RT and CT methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and conventional tillage positively affected sesame capsules per plant and seeds per capsule.

Treatment
RT and CT methodse0
Outcome
number of capsules per plant, and number of seeds per capsulee0
Direction
positively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days to 50% flowering, stem length to the first capsule, plant height, number of capsules per plant, and number of seeds per capsule were positively affected by the RT and CT methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till methods used significantly less fuel, 7.5 L ha^{-1}, than reduced tillage at 26.4 L ha^{-1} and conventional tillage at 71.5 L ha^{-1}.

Treatment
no-till methodse0
Outcome
fuel consumptione0
Direction
lesse0
Value
7.5 L ha^{-1}e0
Qualifier
26.4 L ha^{-1}e0
Comparator
RTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the no-till methods resulted in significantly less fuel consumption, with 7.5 L ha^{-1}, than RT (26.4 L ha^{-1}) and CT (71.5 L ha^{-1})”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till methods gave greater energy savings than reduced and conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-till methodse0
Outcome
energy savingse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the no-till methods provided higher energy savings and lower land preparation costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till methods gave lower land preparation costs.

Treatment
no-till methodse0
Outcome
land preparation costse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the no-till methods provided higher energy savings and lower land preparation costs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage was the most economical method when fuel use, inputs, and seed yield were considered together.

Treatment
RT methode0
Outcome
most economicale0
Direction
most economicale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When fuel consumption, inputs, and seed yield were considered together, the RT method was the most economical.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“sesame”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise reduced tillage for second crop sesame after wheat because of its highest income potential.

Taxon
second crop sesamee0
Outcome
RT method was advised to farmerse0

Verbatim

e0

“the RT method was advised to farmers for second crop sesame after wheat with the highest income potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1816 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.