Paper · 2015 · Revista CERES

Agronomic performance of common bean in straw mulch systems and topdressing nitrogen rates in no-tillage

Tatiana Pagan Loeiro da Cunha; Fábio Luiz Checchio Mingotte; Antonio Carlos de Almeida Carmeis Carmeis Filho; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn no-tillage systems, straw coverage on soil surface is the key to success, and the choice of crops for rotation is crucial to achieve the sustainability and quality that conservation agriculture requires. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic performance of the common bean cultivar IAC Formoso sown in succession to three straw mulch systems (corn alone, corn/Urochloa ruziziensisintercrop and U. ruziziensisalone) and topdress nitrogen rates (0; 40; 80; 120 and 160 kg ha-1N), at the four-leaf stage, three years after the implementation of no-tillage. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block split plot design, with three replications. Common bean highest yields were achieved in succession to U. ruziziensisalone and intercropped with corn. The corn/U. ruziziensisintercrop provided both straw and seed production, allowing for quality no-tillage. Topdressed nitrogen influenced the common bean yield when in succession to corn alone, U. ruziziensisalone and corn/U. ruziziensisintercrop in no-tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean yields were highest in succession to U. ruziziensis alone and to the corn intercrop.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
succession to U. ruziziensisalone and intercropped with corne0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean highest yields were achieved in succession to U. ruziziensisalone and intercropped with corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–783 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The corn/U. ruziziensis intercrop provided both straw and seed production, allowing quality no-tillage.

Taxon
Common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
corn/U. ruziziensisintercrope1
Outcome
straw and seed productione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“The corn/U. ruziziensisintercrop provided both straw and seed production, allowing for quality no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topdressed nitrogen influenced common bean yield in succession to corn alone, U. ruziziensis alone and the corn/U. ruziziensis intercrop in no-tillage.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Topdressed nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Topdressed nitrogen influenced the common bean yield when in succession to corn alone, U. ruziziensisalone and corn/U. ruziziensisintercrop in no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1045 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

intercropping · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

67 papers: 37 positive, 30 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.