Paper · 2012 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Influence of Foliar Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Transplanted Rice

Jagathjothi N; Muthukrishnan P; M. Mohamed Amanullah

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at the wetland of Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during Navarai (Dec - Jan) season 2010–11 to investigate the effect of foliar nutrition on growth, yield attributes and yield of rice. The experiment was laid out in a randomized block design with twelve treatments replicated thrice. The results revealed that combined application of organic and inorganic sources with foliar spray had enhanced effect on growth and yield of rice crop over application of chemical fertilizers or organic sources alone. Among the nutrient management treatments, the plant height, dry matter production, number of tillers, yield attributes and yield of grain (5631 kg ha-1) and straw (7647 kg ha-1) were the highest with recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later. However the yield was comparable with recommended INM practice + 2% DAP spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later and recommended INM practice + 1% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and inorganic inputs with foliar spray enhanced rice growth and yield over single-source inputs.

Treatment
combined application of organic and inorganic sources with foliar spraye0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
application of chemical fertilizers or organic sources alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of organic and inorganic sources with foliar spray had enhanced effect on growth and yield of rice crop over application of chemical fertilizers or organic sources alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

INM with 2% urea phosphate spray gave the highest plant height, dry matter, tillers and yield attributes.

Treatment
recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter production, number of tillerse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant height, dry matter production, number of tillers, yield attributes and yield of grain (5631 kg ha-1) and straw (7647 kg ha-1) were the highest with recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same INM spray treatment gave the highest grain yield of 5631 kg ha-1.

Treatment
recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere0
Outcome
yield of graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5631 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of grain (5631 kg ha-1) and straw (7647 kg ha-1) were the highest with recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same INM spray treatment gave the highest straw yield of 7647 kg ha-1.

Treatment
recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7647 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of grain (5631 kg ha-1) and straw (7647 kg ha-1) were the highest with recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under the 2% urea phosphate spray was comparable to the 2% DAP spray.

Treatment
recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
recommended INM practice + 2% DAP spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield was comparable with recommended INM practice + 2% DAP spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under the 2% urea phosphate spray was comparable to the 1% urea phosphate spray.

Treatment
recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
recommended INM practice + 1% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days latere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended INM practice + 1% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“However the yield was comparable with recommended INM practice + 2% DAP spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later and recommended INM practice + 1% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1089 · show in text ↑
e2

“recommended integrated nutrient management (INM) practice +2% urea phosphate spray at panicle initiation and 10 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

475 papers: 419 positive, 56 negative or no effect

418 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

471 papers more in this group

See all 475 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.