Paper · 2006 · 2006 Portland, Oregon, July 9-12, 2006

Ridge tillage of organic row crops

Erik Flojgaard Kristensen; Claus G. Sorensen

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ridge tillage may improve organic row crop production in terms of higher yields andlower impacts on the environment. Ridge tillage is hardly ever used in Europe. In Denmark, growingof row crops in a ridge tillage system has been tested. In particular, organic grown maize has shownvery promising results. In some of the test plots, yields increased with up to 50 percent as comparedwith conventional flat seedbeds. On average, year 2005 results for organic maize grown on sandysoil showed increased yields of about 20 percent. Prior to putting the ridge tillage method into practice, a number of technical questions have to besolved. The project presented in this paper takes focus on these technical matters. Especially, theestablishment of a uniform ridge at varying soil types and conditions is important. The goal is todevelop a machine able to ridge up the soil, perform precision drilling and make a seedbed withoptimal germinating conditions for the seeds. Another important practical aspect is the machinecapacity and operational performance. In the ongoing project, a four rowed machine for putting upthe ridge and sowing in one operation have been constructed and tested. This machine has a widthof 3 m and a working speed of 4 km per hour resulting in a labour requirement of 1.23 h ha-1and afield capacity of 0.90 ha h-1. In practice, a machine with a width of 6 m and a speed of 5 km per hour may be realistic reducing the labour requirement to.0.58 h ha-1 and increasing the field capacity to1.93 ha h-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage increased yields of organic maize by up to 50% compared with conventional flat seedbeds in some plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
Ridge tillagee4
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 50 percente0
Comparator
conventional flat seedbedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Ridge tillage may improve organic row crop production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“organic grown maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–271 · show in text ↑
e0

“yields increased with up to 50 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–370 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional flat seedbeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic maize yields increased by about 20% on average in the 2005 results.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
about 20 percente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“organic grown maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–271 · show in text ↑
e3

“showed increased yields of about 20 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–525 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four-row ridging and sowing machine required 1.23 h ha-1 labour at 4 km per hour.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
labour requiremente4
Value
1.23 h ha-1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“organic grown maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–271 · show in text ↑
e4

“resulting in a labour requirement of 1.23 h ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1298 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four-row ridging and sowing machine had a field capacity of 0.90 ha h-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
field capacitye5
Value
0.90 ha h-1e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“organic grown maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–271 · show in text ↑
e5

“field capacity of 0.90 ha h-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1332 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

A 6 m machine at 5 km per hour may reduce labour requirement to 0.58 h ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
labour requiremente6
Value
0.58 h ha-1e6
Qualifier
may be realistice6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“organic grown maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–271 · show in text ↑
e6

“may be realistic reducing the labour requirement to.0.58 h ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1469 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The same 6 m machine may increase field capacity to 1.93 ha h-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Outcome
field capacitye7
Value
1.93 ha h-1e7
Qualifier
may be realistice6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“organic grown maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–271 · show in text ↑
e6

“may be realistic reducing the labour requirement to.0.58 h ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1469 · show in text ↑
e7

“increasing the field capacity to1.93 ha h-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1517 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.