Paper · 1969 · Australian Journal of Botany

Studies in the ecology of the Riverine Plain. V. Plant density response of species in a Danthonia caespitosa grassland to 16 years of grazing by Merino sheep

OB Williams

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The species density of 252 permanent quadrats set in plots which were ungrazed and lightly, moderately, and heavily grazed, in a Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grassland, was measured on seven occasions between October 1949 and October 1965. The field data were analysed by means of a Response Index and a Grazing Pressure Index to give the grazing responses of 41 individual species. Those species favoured either by grazing or by non-grazing are listed, and their performance examined in relation to published data on the dietary selection exercised by Merino sheep. The present D. caespitosa grassland is a disclimax one resulting from the grazing of domestic and feral animals, and most species have already come into equilibrium with the total environment. It is suggested that the observed reductions in plant density, size, and the seed crop of annual species in the grazed plots was not followed by the elimination of any species because stocking rates applied in the experiment were no more severe than those which brought about the development of the grassland. The possible unique nature of long-term exclosures in a disclimax grassland is noted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some grassland species were favored by grazing and others by non-grazing.

Taxon
Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grasslandRytidosperma caespitosume1
Outcome
species favoured either by grazing or by non-grazinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rytidosperma caespitosum
Rytidosperma caespitosum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Those species favoured either by grazing or by non-grazing are listed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–453 · show in text ↑
e1

“Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–168 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify the current grassland as a grazing-derived disclimax.

Taxon
D. caespitosaRytidosperma caespitosume0
Interactor
domestic and feral animalse0herbivore
Outcome
disclimaxe0
Qualifier
resulting from the grazing of domestic and feral animalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rytidosperma caespitosum
Rytidosperma caespitosum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The present D. caespitosa grassland is a disclimax one resulting from the grazing of domestic and feral animals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–679 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most species were considered in equilibrium with their environment.

Taxon
D. caespitosaRytidosperma caespitosume1
Outcome
come into equilibrium with the total environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rytidosperma caespitosum
Rytidosperma caespitosum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most species have already come into equilibrium with the total environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“D. caespitosa grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing reduced density, size, and seed crop of annual species.

Taxon
Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grasslandRytidosperma caespitosume1
Treatment
grazed plotse0
Outcome
plant density, size, and the seed crop of annual speciese0
Direction
reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rytidosperma caespitosum
Rytidosperma caespitosum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“observed reductions in plant density, size, and the seed crop of annual species in the grazed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–885 · show in text ↑
e1

“Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–168 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No species was eliminated following grazing-related reductions.

Taxon
Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grasslandRytidosperma caespitosume1
Outcome
elimination of any speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rytidosperma caespitosum
Rytidosperma caespitosum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not followed by the elimination of any species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–936 · show in text ↑
e1

“Danthonia caespitosa Gaudich. grassland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–168 · show in text ↑