Paper · 2012 · PLoS ONE

Geminivirus-Mediated Delivery of Florigen Promotes Determinate Growth in Aerial Organs and Uncouples Flowering from Photoperiod in Cotton

Roisin C. McGarry; Brian G. Ayre

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
59
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Plant architecture and the timing and distribution of reproductive structures are fundamental agronomic traits shaped by patterns of determinate and indeterminate growth. Florigen, encoded by FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) in Arabidopsis and SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS (SFT) in tomato, acts as a general growth hormone, advancing determinate growth. Domestication of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) converted it from a lanky photoperiodic perennial to a highly inbred, compact day-neutral plant that is managed as an annual row-crop. This dramatic change in plant architecture provides a unique opportunity to analyze the transition from perennial to annual growth. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To explore these architectural changes, we addressed the role of day-length upon flowering in an ancestral, perennial accession and in a domesticated variety of cotton. Using a disarmed Cotton leaf crumple virus (CLCrV) as a transient expression system, we delivered FT to both cotton accessions. Ectopic expression of FT in ancestral cotton mimicked the effects of day-length, promoting photoperiod-independent flowering, precocious determinate architecture, and lanceolate leaf shape. Domesticated cotton infected with FT demonstrated more synchronized fruiting and enhanced "annualization". Transient expression of FT also facilitated simple crosses between wild photoperiodic and domesticated day-neutral accessions, effectively demonstrating a mechanism to increase genetic diversity among cultivated lines of cotton. Virus was not detected in the F(1) progeny, indicating that crosses made by this approach do not harbor recombinant DNA molecules. CONCLUSIONS: These findings extend our understanding of FT as a general growth hormone that regulates shoot architecture by advancing organ-specific and age-related determinate growth. Judicious manipulation of FT could benefit cotton architecture to improve crop management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FT expression made ancestral cotton flower independently of photoperiod.

Material
ancestral cottone0
Treatment
Ectopic expression of FTe0
Gene
FTe0
Outcome
photoperiod-independent floweringe0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ectopic expression of FT in ancestral cotton mimicked the effects of day-length, promoting photoperiod-independent flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FT expression promoted precocious determinate architecture and lanceolate leaves in ancestral cotton.

Treatment
FTt0
Gene
FTt0
Outcome
precocious determinate architecture, and lanceolate leaf shapee0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promoting photoperiod-independent flowering, precocious determinate architecture, and lanceolate leaf shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ectopic expression of FT in ancestral cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1039 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FT delivery produced more synchronized fruiting in domesticated cotton.

Material
Domesticated cottone0
Treatment
infected with FTe0
Gene
FTe0
Outcome
fruitinge0
Direction
more synchronizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Domesticated cotton infected with FT demonstrated more synchronized fruiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FT delivery enhanced annualization in domesticated cotton.

Treatment
FTt0
Outcome
"annualization"e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced "annualization"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Domesticated cotton infected with FT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1221 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transient FT expression facilitated crosses between wild and domesticated cotton.

Treatment
Transient expression of FTe0
Gene
FTe0
Outcome
simple crosses between wild photoperiodic and domesticated day-neutral accessionse0
Comparator
wild photoperiodic and domesticated day-neutral accessionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transient expression of FT also facilitated simple crosses between wild photoperiodic and domesticated day-neutral accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus was undetected in F1 progeny from FT-mediated cotton crosses.

Organ / stage
F(1) progenye0
Outcome
Virus was not detected in the F(1) progenye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Virus was not detected in the F(1) progeny”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend judicious FT manipulation for cotton crop management.

Gene
FTe0
Outcome
Judicious manipulation of FT could benefit cotton architecture to improve crop managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Judicious manipulation of FT could benefit cotton architecture to improve crop management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–1926 · show in text ↑

infection · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

stage · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.