Paper · 1999 · Ecological Entomology

Invertebrate communities in a tropical rain forest canopy in Puerto Rico following Hurricane Hugo

T. D. Schowalter; L. M. Ganio

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
85
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary 1. Canopy invertebrate responses to Hurricane Hugo, tree species, and recovery time were examined at the Luquillo Experimental Forest in Puerto Rico during 1991–92 and 1994–95. Six tree species representing early and late successional stages were examined in paired plots representing severe hurricane disturbance (most trees toppled) and light hurricane disturbance (all trees standing and most branches intact). 2. Hurricane disturbance affected invertebrate abundances significantly. Sap‐suckers and molluscs were more abundant, and defoliators, detritivores, and emergent aquatic insects were less abundant in recovering tree‐fall gaps than in intact forest during this 5‐year period. These changes in functional organisation are consistent with comparable studies of arthropod responses to canopy removal during harvest in temperate forests. 3. Tree species also affected invertebrate abundances significantly, but invertebrate communities did not differ significantly between the three early successional and three later successional tree species. 4. Most taxa showed significant annual variation in abundances, but only two Homoptera species showed a significant linear decline in abundance through time, perhaps reflecting long‐term trends during recovery. 5. Leaf area missing, an indicator of herbivore effect on canopy processes, showed significant seasonal and annual trends, as well as differences among tree species and hurricane treatments. Generally, leaf area missing peaked during the wet season each year, but reached its highest levels during an extended drought in 1994. Leaf area missing also tended to be higher on the more abundant tree species in each disturbance treatment. 6. Herbivore abundances and leaf area missing were not related to concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, or calcium in the foliage. 7. This study demonstrated that invertebrate community structure and herbivory are dynamic processes that reflect the influences of host species and variable environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hurricane disturbance significantly affected canopy invertebrate abundance.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
invertebrate abundancese0
Setting
Hurricane disturbancee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Hurricane disturbance affected invertebrate abundances significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sap-suckers and molluscs were more abundant in tree-fall gaps than intact forest.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
Sap‐suckers and molluscse0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
intact foreste0
Setting
recovering tree‐fall gapse0

Verbatim

e0

“Sap‐suckers and molluscs were more abundant, and defoliators, detritivores, and emergent aquatic insects were less abundant in recovering tree‐fall gaps than in intact forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliators, detritivores and emergent aquatic insects were less abundant in tree-fall gaps than intact forest.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
defoliators, detritivores, and emergent aquatic insectse0
Direction
less abundante0
Comparator
intact foreste0

Verbatim

e0

“Sap‐suckers and molluscs were more abundant, and defoliators, detritivores, and emergent aquatic insects were less abundant in recovering tree‐fall gaps than in intact forest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree species significantly affected invertebrate abundance.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Material
Tree speciese0
Outcome
invertebrate abundancese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Tree species also affected invertebrate abundances significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–922 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Invertebrate communities did not differ significantly between early and late successional trees.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
invertebrate communitiese0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
three later successional tree speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“invertebrate communities did not differ significantly between the three early successional and three later successional tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most invertebrate taxa had significant annual abundance variation.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
annual variation in abundancese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Most taxa showed significant annual variation in abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Homoptera species declined linearly through recovery time.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Interactor
Homopterae0herbivore
Outcome
decline in abundancee0
Direction
declinee0

Verbatim

e0

“only two Homoptera species showed a significant linear decline in abundance through time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area missing varied significantly by season and year.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
Leaf area missinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area missing, an indicator of herbivore effect on canopy processes, showed significant seasonal and annual trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1394 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area missing differed by tree species and hurricane treatment.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Material
tree speciese0
Outcome
Leaf area missinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area missing, an indicator of herbivore effect on canopy processes, showed significant seasonal and annual trends, as well as differences among tree species and hurricane treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area missing generally peaked in the wet season.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
leaf area missinge0
Direction
peakede0

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area missing peaked during the wet season each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1531 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area missing was highest during the 1994 drought.

Taxon
tree speciese2
Outcome
Leaf area missinge1
Direction
highest levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“reached its highest levels during an extended drought in 1994”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1598 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf area missing also tended to be higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1642 · show in text ↑
e2

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area missing tended to be higher on more abundant tree species.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Material
more abundant tree speciese0
Outcome
Leaf area missinge0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area missing also tended to be higher on the more abundant tree species in each disturbance treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivore abundance and leaf area missing were unrelated to foliar nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium or calcium.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Organ / stage
foliagee0
Outcome
Herbivore abundances and leaf area missinge0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Herbivore abundances and leaf area missing were not related to concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium, or calcium in the foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1851 · show in text ↑
e1

“Six tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–201 · show in text ↑