Paper · 2006 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Integrating bioagents with plant extract, oil cake and fungicide in various modes of application for the better management of web blight of urdbean

S. C. Dubey

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the integration of treatments based on a bioagent (Trichoderma viride), botanical (leaf extract and cake of Pongamia glabra), fungicide (carboxin) and Rhizobium sp. in various modes of applications for the management of web blight (Rhizoctonia solani Kühn) and their influence on grain yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper). Modes of applications were soil treatment, seed treatment and foliar spray. Among 54 integrations evaluated, soil application of P. glabra cake (200 kg ha−1), seed treatment with integration of T. viride (2 g kg−1 seed), carboxin (1 g kg−1 seed) and Rhizobium sp. (25 g kg−1 seed), and foliar spray of P. glabra leaf extract (10%) were found superior as they increased seed germination by 31.6%, yield by 36.0% and reduced disease intensity by 94.8%, and also significantly enhanced plant height, root length and number of root nodules of urdbean. The same integration without corboxin was also effective and could be used in organic production of urdbean. The integration of any two modes of application was found superior over any one alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated application increased urdbean seed germination by 31.6%.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Treatment
soil application of P. glabra cake (200 kg ha−1), seed treatment with integration of T. viride (2 g kg−1 seed), carboxin (1 g kg−1 seed) and Rhizobium sp. (25 g kg−1 seed), and foliar spray of P. glabra leaf extract (10%)e1
Outcome
seed germinatione1
Direction
increasede1
Value
31.6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of P. glabra cake (200 kg ha−1), seed treatment with integration of T. viride (2 g kg−1 seed), carboxin (1 g kg−1 seed) and Rhizobium sp. (25 g kg−1 seed), and foliar spray of P. glabra leaf extract (10%) were found superior as they increased seed germination by 31.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated application increased urdbean yield by 36.0%.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Treatment
soil application of P. glabra cake (200 kg ha−1), seed treatment with integration of T. viride (2 g kg−1 seed), carboxin (1 g kg−1 seed) and Rhizobium sp. (25 g kg−1 seed), and foliar spray of P. glabra leaf extract (10%)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
36.0%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of P. glabra cake (200 kg ha−1), seed treatment with integration of T. viride (2 g kg−1 seed), carboxin (1 g kg−1 seed) and Rhizobium sp. (25 g kg−1 seed), and foliar spray of P. glabra leaf extract (10%) were found superior as they increased seed germination by 31.6%, yield by 36.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated application reduced web blight intensity by 94.8%.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe0
Outcome
disease intensitye1
Direction
reducede1
Value
94.8%e1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced disease intensity by 94.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration significantly increased plant height, root length and root nodules.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe1
Outcome
plant height, root length and number of root nodulese1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly enhanced plant height, root length and number of root nodules of urdbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–943 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integration without carboxin was also effective for organic urdbean production.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe1
Treatment
same integration without corboxine1
Outcome
effectivee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of urdbean (Vigna mungo [L.] Hepper)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“The same integration without corboxin was also effective and could be used in organic production of urdbean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integration of two application modes surpassed one mode alone.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungot0
Treatment
any two modes of applicatione0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
any one alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“urdbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“The integration of any two modes of application was found superior over any one alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1139 · show in text ↑

Pongamia pinnata · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

64 papers: 64 positive, 0 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

botanical · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 27 positive, 11 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.