Paper · 2013 · Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo

Identification of the most desirable maize testing environments in northern Serbia

Stanisavljevic Dusan; Mitrovic Bojan; Mirosavljevic Milan; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

One of the final stages in the process of maize breeding is testing the potential hybrids in pre-registration multi-location trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate six locations (Pančevo, Sremska Mitrovica, Ruma, Srbobran, Rimski Šančevi and Sombor) in the northern Serbia for testing yields of maize seed hybrid by GGE (Genotype and Genotype by Environment Interaction) biplot method in the period from 2007 to 2011. This study comprised 24 maize hybrids tested across 6 environments. Different sets of hybrid were used every year. Hybrids served as 'a random' factor for the evaluation of locations. The ANOVA indicated significant effects of genotypes (G) and environments (E) every year, while their interaction (GE) was significant in 2007, 2009 and 2011. On average, the SO location provided the smallest amount of information and therefore can be excluded from further trials and analysis. The sites SM and RU were the most similar locations and only one of these two locations should be included in further trials. The location RŠ presented the smallest repeatability. For analysis that is more detailed it is necessary to include more locations in trials and analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and environment effects were significant every year.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
effects of genotypes (G) and environments (E)e0
Qualifier
every yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ANOVA indicated significant effects of genotypes (G) and environments (E) every year, while their interaction (GE) was significant in 2007, 2009 and 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment interaction was significant in 2007, 2009 and 2011.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
interaction (GE)e0
Qualifier
2007, 2009 and 2011e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ANOVA indicated significant effects of genotypes (G) and environments (E) every year, while their interaction (GE) was significant in 2007, 2009 and 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SO provided the smallest amount of information on average.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
amount of informatione0
Direction
smalleste0
Setting
SOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, the SO location provided the smallest amount of information and therefore can be excluded from further trials and analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude SO can be excluded from further trials.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
excluded from further trials and analysise0
Setting
SOe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, the SO location provided the smallest amount of information and therefore can be excluded from further trials and analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SM and RU were the most similar locations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
most similar locationse0
Direction
most similare0
Setting
SM and RUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sites SM and RU were the most similar locations and only one of these two locations should be included in further trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Only one of SM and RU should be included in further trials.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
only one of these two locations should be included in further trialse0
Setting
SM and RUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sites SM and RU were the most similar locations and only one of these two locations should be included in further trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RŠ had the smallest repeatability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
smalleste0
Setting
RŠe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The location RŠ presented the smallest repeatability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More locations are necessary for more detailed analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
include more locations in trials and analysise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For analysis that is more detailed it is necessary to include more locations in trials and analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑