Paper · 2013 · Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova

EVALUATION OF YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) IN INTERCROPPING WITH SPRING BARLEY (HORDEUM VULGARE L.)

M. Rahimi Azar; A. Javanmard; F. Shekari; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Intercropping is considered for increasing and stability of yield per average unit. In order to evaluate the effect of barley/chickpea intercrop, a study was carried out in the research field of Faculty of Agriculture, Maragheh University, in 2009 as randomized compelet block design, with three replicates, with row replacement series. Treatments included different combinations (1:1,2:1, 3:1, 2:2 and 3:2 row ratios of barley:chickpea) and their monocultures. Results indicated that the highest yield was obtained from combination of one row barley and one row Desi chickpea.The highest number of pods was obtained, also, in combination of one row barley and one row Desi chickpea. There was a significant difference among treatments including Desi chickpea and Kabuli chickpea 100-grain weight that its Kabuli chickpea was more. The correlation coefficient analysis indicated that number of pods per plot had the highest positive relationship and protein percentage had the highest negative relationship with yield per plot. The path coefficient analysis showed that the number of pods had the highest direct effect on yield percentage via the number of pods

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One barley row with one Desi chickpea row produced the highest yield.

Taxon
Desi chickpeae0
Treatment
one row barley and one row Desi chickpeae0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield was obtained from combination of one row barley and one row Desi chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One barley row with one Desi chickpea row produced the highest pod number.

Taxon
Desi chickpeae0
Treatment
one row barley and one row Desi chickpeae0
Interactor
barleyHordeum vulgaree0other
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · InteractorJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of pods was obtained, also, in combination of one row barley and one row Desi chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–691 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Kabuli chickpea had greater 100-grain weight than Desi chickpea, with a significant difference.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Kabuli chickpeae0
Outcome
100-grain weighte0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Desi chickpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant difference among treatments including Desi chickpea and Kabuli chickpea 100-grain weight that its Kabuli chickpea was more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–839 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod number per plot showed the strongest positive relation with yield per plot.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
podse0
Outcome
yield per plote0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
highest positive relationshipe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods per plot had the highest positive relationship and protein percentage had the highest negative relationship with yield per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein percentage showed the strongest negative relation with yield per plot.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Outcome
yield per plote0
Direction
negativee0
Comparator
protein percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods per plot had the highest positive relationship and protein percentage had the highest negative relationship with yield per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Path analysis found pod number had the highest direct effect on yield percentage.

Taxon
CHICKPEACicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
podse0
Outcome
yield percentagee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of pods had the highest direct effect on yield percentage via the number of pods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑