Paper · 2012 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Response of Eight Sweet Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids to Saflufenacil Alone or Pre-Mixed with Dimethenamid-P

Darren E. Robinson; Nader Soltani; Peter H. Sikkema

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Saflufenacil is a new herbicide for use in field maize (Zea mays L.) and other crops that may have potential for weed management in sweet maize. Tolerance of eight sweet maize hybrids to saflufenacil and saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p applied preemergence (PRE) were studied at two Ontario locations in 2008 and 2009. Saflufenacil applied PRE at 75 and 150 g·ha–1 and saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p (pre-mixed) applied PRE at 735 and 1470 g·ha–1 caused minimal (less than 5%) injury in Cahill, GH4927, Harvest Gold, Rocker, BSS5362, GG236, GG447, and GG763 sweet maize hybrids at 1 and 2 weeks after emergence (WAE). Saflufenacil or saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p applied PRE did not reduce plant height, cob size, or yield of any of the sweet maize hybrids tested in this study. Based on these results, saflufenacil and saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p pre-mixed applied PRE at the doses evaluated can be safely used for weed management in Cahill, GH4927, Harvest Gold, Rocker, BSS5362, GG236, GG447, and GG763 sweet maize under Ontario environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested herbicides caused less than 5% injury across eight hybrids at 1 and 2 WAE.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
Saflufenacil applied PRE at 75 and 150 g·ha–1e0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
minimale0
Value
less than 5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saflufenacil applied PRE at 75 and 150 g·ha–1 and saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p (pre-mixed) applied PRE at 735 and 1470 g·ha–1 caused minimal (less than 5%) injury in Cahill, GH4927, Harvest Gold, Rocker, BSS5362, GG236, GG447, and GG763 sweet maize hybrids at 1 and 2 weeks after emergence (WAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p caused less than 5% injury across the tested hybrids.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p (pre-mixed) applied PRE at 735 and 1470 g·ha–1e0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
minimale0
Value
less than 5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p (pre-mixed) applied PRE at 735 and 1470 g·ha–1 caused minimal (less than 5%) injury in Cahill, GH4927, Harvest Gold, Rocker, BSS5362, GG236, GG447, and GG763 sweet maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil did not reduce plant height, cob size or yield.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
Saflufenacile0
Outcome
plant height, cob size, or yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saflufenacil or saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p applied PRE did not reduce plant height, cob size, or yield of any of the sweet maize hybrids tested in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p did not reduce plant height, cob size or yield.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-pe0
Outcome
plant height, cob size, or yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Saflufenacil or saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p applied PRE did not reduce plant height, cob size, or yield of any of the sweet maize hybrids tested in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–784 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded saflufenacil could be safely used for sweet maize weed management at tested doses in Ontario.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
saflufenacile0
Outcome
safely used for weed managemente0
Setting
Ontario environmental conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“saflufenacil and saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p pre-mixed applied PRE at the doses evaluated can be safely used for weed management in Cahill, GH4927, Harvest Gold, Rocker, BSS5362, GG236, GG447, and GG763 sweet maize under Ontario environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1068 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded the saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p mixture could be safely used for sweet maize weed management.

Taxon
sweet maizee0
Treatment
saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p pre-mixede0
Outcome
safely used for weed managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“saflufenacil and saflufenacil plus dimethenamid-p pre-mixed applied PRE at the doses evaluated can be safely used for weed management in Cahill, GH4927, Harvest Gold, Rocker, BSS5362, GG236, GG447, and GG763 sweet maize under Ontario environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1068 · show in text ↑

dimethenamid-P · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

dimethenamid-P · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

saflufenacil · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

saflufenacil · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 26 positive, 35 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.