Paper · 1989 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Effect of plant density and row spacing on the yield of chickpea (cv. Tyson) grown on the Darling Downs, south-eastern Queensland

DF Beech; GJ Leach

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth and yield of chickpea, Cicer arietinum cv. Tyson, were studied at 4 row spacings (180, 360, 530 and 710 mm) and 4 plant population densities (14, 28, 42 and 56 plants m-2) in factorial combination in a wet and a dry growing season on a vertisol at Dalby, south-eastern Queensland. In both years, row spacing had only a small effect on above-ground dry matter production and yield, and there were no significant interactions between row spacing and plant population density. Above-ground dry matter production increased significantly with increase in plant population density for about 120 days after sowing. Seed yield increased significantly from 104 to 126 g m-2 in the drier season (106 mm rain, May-October) with increase in plant population density from 14 to 56 plants m-2. In the wetter season (286 mm rain, May- October), the corresponding trend in yield was from 262 to 287 g m-2. The response was attributed chiefly to larger seed size in the wet year, and higher harvest index in the dry year. We conclude that a density of at least 40 plants m-2 is required to attain maximum seed yield in southeastern Queensland. Although row spacing had no significant effect on yield, our earlier research indicated potential benefits from narrow row spacing, particularly for mechanised crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had only a small effect on above-ground dry matter production and yield of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
row spacinge1
Outcome
above-ground dry matter production and yielde1
Direction
only a small effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“In both years, row spacing had only a small effect on above-ground dry matter production and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant interactions between row spacing and plant population density.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
interactions between row spacing and plant population densitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“there were no significant interactions between row spacing and plant population density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Above-ground dry matter production increased significantly with plant population density for about 120 days after sowing.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant population densitye3
Outcome
Above-ground dry matter productione3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
for about 120 days after sowinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Above-ground dry matter production increased significantly with increase in plant population density for about 120 days after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield increased significantly from 104 to 126 g m-2 with plant density from 14 to 56 plants m-2 in the drier season.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant population densitye4
Outcome
Seed yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
104 to 126 g m-2e4
Setting
drier season (106 mm rain, May-October)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seed yield increased significantly from 104 to 126 g m-2 in the drier season (106 mm rain, May-October) with increase in plant population density from 14 to 56 plants m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield trend with plant density in the wetter season rose from 262 to 287 g m-2.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant population densitye4
Outcome
trend in yielde5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
262 to 287 g m-2e5
Setting
wetter season (286 mm rain, May- October)e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seed yield increased significantly from 104 to 126 g m-2 in the drier season (106 mm rain, May-October) with increase in plant population density from 14 to 56 plants m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–785 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the wetter season (286 mm rain, May- October), the corresponding trend in yield was from 262 to 287 g m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–895 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The seed yield response to density was attributed chiefly to larger seed size in the wet year and higher harvest index in the dry year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
responsee6
Qualifier
larger seed size in the wet year, and higher harvest index in the dry yeare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e6

“The response was attributed chiefly to larger seed size in the wet year, and higher harvest index in the dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1010 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A density of at least 40 plants m-2 is required to attain maximum seed yield of chickpea in southeastern Queensland.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
density of at least 40 plants m-2e7
Setting
southeastern Queenslande7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e7

“We conclude that a density of at least 40 plants m-2 is required to attain maximum seed yield in southeastern Queensland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had no significant effect on chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
row spacinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no significant effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (cv. Tyson)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although row spacing had no significant effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1189 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 64 positive, 7 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.