Paper · 1959 · Annals of Applied Biology

STUDIES ON PLANT GROWTH‐REGULATING SUBSTANCES

HELEN VITOU; R. L. WAIN

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The cress‐root test and the maize‐root segment tests, both of which depend on the measurement of root‐growth inhibition, have been used to assess the growth‐regulating activity of a wide range of phenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids. The results are presented and compared with those obtained with the same compounds in other tests in which shoot tissues were employed. The results are also discussed in relation to current theories on mode of action and structure/activity relationship. These studies included the ‘α‐hydrogen’ effect, the activity of stereoisomers and activity of homologues of seventeen series of ω‐phenoxyalkanecarboxylic acids, considered in relation to their degradation within the tissues by β‐oxidation. Earlier findings were largely confirmed. Compounds which had previously been shown to be active in shoot tests such as the wheat‐cylinder, the pea‐curvature and the pea‐segment tests, were found to be active in the root‐growth inhibition tests and, furthermore, the degree of activity was usually similar. It is concluded that the two root tests investigated are of real value in assessing the activity of phenoxy acids in studies on the relationships between chemical structure and plant growth‐regulating activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compounds active in shoot tests were active in root-growth inhibition tests.

Outcome
active in the root‐growth inhibition testse0
Comparator
shoot testse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compounds which had previously been shown to be active in shoot tests such as the wheat‐cylinder, the pea‐curvature and the pea‐segment tests, were found to be active in the root‐growth inhibition tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–964 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenoxy acid activity was usually similar in root and shoot tests.

Taxon
PLANTt0
Outcome
degree of activitye0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

t0

“PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“the degree of activity was usually similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1025 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged both root tests valuable for assessing phenoxy acid activity.

Taxon
PLANTt0
Outcome
real value in assessing the activity of phenoxy acidse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

t0

“PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
e0

“the two root tests investigated are of real value in assessing the activity of phenoxy acids in studies on the relationships between chemical structure and plant growth‐regulating activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1236 · show in text ↑