Paper · 1977 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

EFFECTS OF HIGH RATES OF NITROGEN ON NEEPAWA WHEAT GROWN UNDER IRRIGATION II. MILLING AND BAKING QUALITY

K. H. TIPPLES; S. DUBETZ; G. N. IRVINE

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Forty-one composites of a hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Neepawa), grown under irrigation in five fertilizer trials at four locations in Southern Alberta over a period of 3 yr, were subjected to milling, baking and allied tests. Very high protein content (e.g. over 17% on a 13.5% moisture basis) was associated in several instances with a marked weakening of physical dough characteristics and a deterioration in baking quality. Quality data from commercial railway carlots of Canadian red spring wheat were used to put the fertilizer study results into perspective and to show that although certain combinations of high nitrogen fertilizer application with location, cultivar and growing conditions may cause undesirable deterioration in baking quality, this is unlikely to cause problems in cargo quantities of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Very high grain protein content (over 17% on a 13.5% moisture basis) was associated in several instances with weaker physical dough characteristics and poorer baking quality in Neepawa wheat.

Material
NEEPAWAt0
Outcome
physical dough characteristics and a deterioration in baking qualitye0
Direction
weakeninge0
Qualifier
over 17% on a 13.5% moisture basise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Very high protein content (e.g. over 17% on a 13.5% moisture basis) was associated in several instances with a marked weakening of physical dough characteristics and a deterioration in baking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEEPAWA WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Certain combinations of high nitrogen fertilizer application with location, cultivar and growing conditions may cause undesirable deterioration in baking quality.

Treatment
high nitrogen fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
baking qualitye0
Direction
deterioratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“certain combinations of high nitrogen fertilizer application with location, cultivar and growing conditions may cause undesirable deterioration in baking quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“NEEPAWA WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The deterioration in baking quality is unlikely to cause problems in cargo quantities of wheat, judged from commercial railway carlot quality data.

Outcome
problems in cargo quantities of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this is unlikely to cause problems in cargo quantities of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–836 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.