Paper · 2004 · Peanut Science

Effect of Cultivar and Plant Population on Spotted Wilt in Virginia Market-Type Peanut

C. A. Hurt; R. L. Brandenburg; D. L. Jordan; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted in North Carolina during 2001 and 2002 to evaluate the impact of cultivar and plant population on the incidence of symptoms of tomato spotted wilt virus, which is transmitted primarily by tobacco thrips [Frankliniellafusca (Hinds) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)]. Treatments included the Virginia market-type cultivars Gregory, NC-V 11, and Perry seeded at in-row plant populations of 7, 13, and 17 plants/m. In these experiments, there was a consistent trend for increased foliar injury from thrips as plant population decreased. Less thrips feeding injury was noted for Gregory and Perry than for NC-V 11. Incidence of visual symptoms of spotted wilt (SW) was recorded from mid-June through mid-September. A plant condition rating was recorded late in the season. Consistent with the results for thrips-induced injury, the percentage of plants infected with SW and the plant condition rating increased as plant population decreased. Gregory had the lowest SW incidence, while NC-V 11 was intermediate between Gregory and the most susceptible Perry. Establishing higher plant densities and planting Gregory rather than NC-V 11 or Perry reduced SW incidence and plant condition rating. Gregory had consistently the highest %ELK (extra large kernels) and %FP (fancy pods) across treatments and locations whereas no definitive trend in market grade characteristics were noted among treatments. In some cases, Perry had a higher incidence of SW, but still had higher pod yields than NC-V 11 with a lower incidence of SW. However, in most cases pod yield correlated with plant condition ratings, and as thrips injury increased, pod yield decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips foliar injury increased as peanut plant population decreased.

Material
plant populatione0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
foliar injury from thripse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a consistent trend for increased foliar injury from thrips as plant population decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–567 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gregory and Perry had less thrips feeding injury than NC-V 11.

Material
Gregory and Perrye0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thrips feeding injurye0
Direction
Lesse0
Comparator
NC-V 11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Less thrips feeding injury was noted for Gregory and Perry than for NC-V 11.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spotted wilt infection percentage increased as plant population decreased.

Material
plant populatione0
Outcome
percentage of plants infected with SWe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of plants infected with SW and the plant condition rating increased as plant population decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant condition rating increased as plant population decreased.

Material
plant populatione0
Outcome
plant condition ratinge0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of plants infected with SW and the plant condition rating increased as plant population decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gregory had the lowest spotted wilt incidence, NC-V 11 was intermediate, and Perry was most susceptible.

Material
Gregorye0
Outcome
SW incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
NC-V 11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gregory had the lowest SW incidence, while NC-V 11 was intermediate between Gregory and the most susceptible Perry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater peanut planting density reduced spotted wilt incidence and plant condition rating.

Treatment
higher plant densitiese0
Outcome
SW incidence and plant condition ratinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Establishing higher plant densities and planting Gregory rather than NC-V 11 or Perry reduced SW incidence and plant condition rating.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gregory consistently had the highest percentage extra-large kernels and fancy pods.

Material
Gregorye0
Outcome
%ELK (extra large kernels) and %FP (fancy pods)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gregory had consistently the highest %ELK (extra large kernels) and %FP (fancy pods) across treatments and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perry sometimes had higher spotted wilt incidence but higher pod yield than NC-V 11.

Material
Perrye0
Outcome
pod yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
NC-V 11e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In some cases, Perry had a higher incidence of SW, but still had higher pod yields than NC-V 11 with a lower incidence of SW.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield generally correlated with plant condition ratings.

Outcome
pod yielde0
Comparator
plant condition ratingse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in most cases pod yield correlated with plant condition ratings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield decreased as thrips injury increased.

Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as thrips injury increased, pod yield decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

density · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.