Paper · 1995 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Identification of Tuber spp and corresponding ectomycorrhizae through molecular markers

Francesco Paolocci; Paola Angelini; Ettore Cristofari; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Analyses, based on the structure of the rDNA region, were developed to examine the possibility of identifying and typing some of the most important Tuber spp at both the symbiotic and non‐symbiotic levels. Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction using specific primer pairs on genomic DNAs, isolated from ascocarps and ectomycorrhizae of various Tuber spp and from rootlets of uninoculated host plants. The variability in the lengths of ITS amplification products of DNA isolated from fruit bodies allowed a primary discrimination of the Tuber spp considered. At the ecto‐mycorrhizal level the same species showed a pattern which was the combination of those typical of Tuber plus the host plants. Southern analyses, performed using the ITS product of Tuber brumale as a probe, confirmed the previous results: each fungus species showed a specific pattern, as well as each Tuber ‐host plant combination. It is concluded that molecular markers from the rDNA region can be used to differentiate Tuber spp and that the method proposed could be used to check and certify mycorrhizally infected plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ITS product lengths distinguished the Tuber species studied using fruit-body DNA.

Taxon
Tuber sppTubere0
Outcome
primary discrimination of the Tuber sppe0
Comparator
Tuber spp considerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tuber
Tuber · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Poppy assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The variability in the lengths of ITS amplification products of DNA isolated from fruit bodies allowed a primary discrimination of the Tuber spp considered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–610 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ectomycorrhizal ITS patterns combined Tuber and host plant patterns.

Taxon
host plantse0
Interactor
TuberTubere0symbiont
Outcome
pattern which was the combination of those typical of Tuber plus the host plantse0
Comparator
those typical of Tubere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tuber
Tuber · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Poppy assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the ecto‐mycorrhizal level the same species showed a pattern which was the combination of those typical of Tuber plus the host plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–748 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Southern analysis found species-specific fungus patterns and distinct Tuber–host plant combinations.

Taxon
host plante0
Interactor
TuberTubere0symbiont
Outcome
specific patterne0
Comparator
each Tuber ‐host plant combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tuber
Tuber · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Poppy assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Southern analyses, performed using the ITS product of Tuber brumale as a probe, confirmed the previous results: each fungus species showed a specific pattern, as well as each Tuber ‐host plant combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–954 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded rDNA markers can differentiate Tuber species and certify mycorrhizally infected plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
Tuber sppTubere0symbiont
Outcome
check and certify mycorrhizally infected plantse0
Comparator
differentiate Tuber sppe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tuber
Tuber · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)No machine-readable author provided. Poppy assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“molecular markers from the rDNA region can be used to differentiate Tuber spp and that the method proposed could be used to check and certify mycorrhizally infected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1148 · show in text ↑