Paper · 1983 · Crop Science

Differential Survival of Genes in a Composite Cross of Sorghum1

K. R. Keim; D. T. Rosenow; F. R. Miller; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A composite‐cross population, grown to the F 7 generation under nonirrigated field conditions at Lubbock, Tex., was evaluated for the effect of natural selection on the expression of six simply inherited plant and grain traits in sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Results indicated that endosperm type was not affected by natural selection. Genes producing awns, red pericarp color, and presence of a seed testa were at a selective advantage. The linked traits of midrib juiciness and plant color indicated that midrib color was not subject to natural selection, but tan plants were at a selective disadvantage. Data presented indicate which of the traits studied are advantageous in a semi‐arid environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural selection did not affect sorghum endosperm type.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
natural selectione0
Outcome
endosperm typee0
Direction
not affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“endosperm type was not affected by natural selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes producing awns had a selective advantage.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Gene
Genes producing awnse0
Outcome
selective advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genes producing awns, red pericarp color, and presence of a seed testa were at a selective advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes producing red pericarp color had a selective advantage.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Gene
red pericarp colore0
Outcome
selective advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genes producing awns, red pericarp color, and presence of a seed testa were at a selective advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes producing a seed testa had a selective advantage.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Gene
presence of a seed testae0
Outcome
selective advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genes producing awns, red pericarp color, and presence of a seed testa were at a selective advantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midrib color was not subject to natural selection.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
natural selectione0
Outcome
midrib colore0
Direction
not subjecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“midrib color was not subject to natural selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tan sorghum plants were at a selective disadvantage.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Material
tan plantse0
Outcome
selective disadvantagee0
Direction
disadvantagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tan plants were at a selective disadvantage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62 · show in text ↑