Paper · 2009 · eScholarship (California Digital Library)

Influence of Legume/rice Sequence and Nitrogen on NERICA rice in Rainfed Upland and Lowland Ecologies of West Africa

K. A. Okeleye

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One major limitation in tropical agriculture is the loss of productivity of soils due to continuous cultivation. This is often due to leaching losses of nutrients, erosion or crop removal. There is need to explore improving productivity of soils by using grain legumes complemented with low-use of applied nitrogen. Modern interspecific rice hybrids called New Rice for Africa (NERICA®) are low input cultivars developed to overcome environmental stresses including low soil fertility. The productivity of these NERICAs under legume/rice rotation and low-nitrogen (0 vs. 30 kgN ha-1) was evaluated in farmers’ fields in 2007 and 2008 in rainfed upland in Kasuwa Mangani (10o24’N, 7o42’E; northern Guinea savanna), and lowland at Edozhigi (09º 45′N, 06 º 7′E; southern Guinea savanna) ecologies in West Africa. Preceding plots of incorporated soybean and Mucuna after harvest, gave 33% increments in rice yield over the previous control-fallow plots in the upland ecology. While, in the lowland, plots with previously incorporated grain soybean (cv. TG× 1485 – 1D) and dual-purpose cowpea (cv. IT 98K–131–2) residues gave about 0.8 Mg ha-1 greater rice yield than plots with previous mucuna or dual-purpose soybean. Although NERICA L–42 produced over 25% more tillers and panicles than the farmers’ cultivar, both cultivars had similar yield of 3.6 Mg ha-1, possibly because of the severe effects of iron- toxicity that limited their potentials. Results showed that upland NERICA rice would perform better after soybean or mucuna rotation, and the lowland NERICA after soybean or dual-purpose cowpea cultivation than traditional fallow.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporated soybean and Mucuna residues gave 33% higher rice yield than the control-fallow plots in the upland

Treatment
incorporated soybean and Mucunae1
Outcome
rice yielde1
Direction
incrementse1
Value
33%e1
Comparator
control-fallow plotse1
Setting
rainfed upland in Kasuwa Manganie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Preceding plots of incorporated soybean and Mucuna after harvest, gave 33% increments in rice yield over the previous control-fallow plots in the upland ecology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–970 · show in text ↑
e2

“in farmers’ fields in 2007 and 2008 in rainfed upland in Kasuwa Mangani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previously incorporated grain soybean residues gave about 0.8 Mg ha-1 greater rice yield than mucuna or dual-purpose soybean in the lowland

Treatment
previously incorporated grain soybeane3
Outcome
rice yielde3
Direction
greatere3
Value
0.8 Mg ha-1e3
Qualifier
dual-purpose cowpea (cv. IT 98K–131–2) residuese3
Comparator
previous mucuna or dual-purpose soybeane3
Setting
lowland at Edozhigie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in the lowland, plots with previously incorporated grain soybean (cv. TG× 1485 – 1D) and dual-purpose cowpea (cv. IT 98K–131–2) residues gave about 0.8 Mg ha-1 greater rice yield than plots with previous mucuna or dual-purpose soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1213 · show in text ↑
e4

“lowland at Edozhigi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–737 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NERICA L–42 produced over 25% more tillers and panicles than the farmers’ cultivar

Taxon
NERICA ricet0
Material
NERICA L–42e5
Outcome
tillers and paniclese5
Direction
moree5
Value
25%e5
Comparator
farmers’ cultivare5

Verbatim

t0

“NERICA rice in Rainfed Upland and Lowland Ecologies of West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–116 · show in text ↑
e5

“Although NERICA L–42 produced over 25% more tillers and panicles than the farmers’ cultivar, both cultivars had similar yield of 3.6 Mg ha-1, possibly because of the severe effects of iron- toxicity that limited their potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1443 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NERICA L–42 and the farmers’ cultivar had similar yield of 3.6 Mg ha-1, possibly because of iron toxicity

Taxon
NERICA ricet0
Material
NERICA L–42e5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
similare5
Value
3.6 Mg ha-1e5
Qualifier
possibly because of the severe effects of iron- toxicitye5
Comparator
farmers’ cultivare5

Verbatim

t0

“NERICA rice in Rainfed Upland and Lowland Ecologies of West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–116 · show in text ↑
e5

“Although NERICA L–42 produced over 25% more tillers and panicles than the farmers’ cultivar, both cultivars had similar yield of 3.6 Mg ha-1, possibly because of the severe effects of iron- toxicity that limited their potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1443 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Upland NERICA rice would perform better after soybean or mucuna rotation than traditional fallow

Taxon
NERICA ricee6
Treatment
soybean or mucuna rotatione6
Outcome
perform better after soybean or mucuna rotatione6

Verbatim

e6

“Results showed that upland NERICA rice would perform better after soybean or mucuna rotation, and the lowland NERICA after soybean or dual-purpose cowpea cultivation than traditional fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1634 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lowland NERICA would perform better after soybean or dual-purpose cowpea cultivation than traditional fallow

Taxon
NERICA ricee6
Treatment
soybean or dual-purpose cowpea cultivatione6
Outcome
the lowland NERICA after soybean or dual-purpose cowpea cultivation than traditional fallowe6

Verbatim

e6

“Results showed that upland NERICA rice would perform better after soybean or mucuna rotation, and the lowland NERICA after soybean or dual-purpose cowpea cultivation than traditional fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1634 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Mucuna · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.