Paper · 1969 · Canadian Journal of Botany

The biosystematics of Trillium rugelii from Rutherford County, North Carolina

Cornelia Ann Serota

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A karyotypic and statistical study was made of samples from three populations of Trillium rugelii Rendle from Rutherford County, North Carolina. The data collected were compared with the karyotypes and statistics for Trillium flexipes Raf. (T. gleasoni Fern.) from western North Carolina and Tennessee, and for five members of the T. erectum L. complex. Trillium rugelii grows sympatrically with T. grandiftorum (Michx.) Salisb. and T. cuneatum Raf., two species which are morphologically dissimilar to it; but it is geographically isolated from T. flexipes and members of the T. erectum complex, the taxa which are morphologically most similar to it. The modal karyotypic comparison and the scatter diagrams correlate to show that this taxon is closely related to T. erectum var. album (Michx.) Pursh, T. simile Gleason, and probably to T. flexipes. There is evidence of distinct karyotypic variability among individual plants in T. rugelii. Although no chromosome types are peculiar to this taxon, there are no plant karyotypes (diploid sets) identical with those for T. rugelii among the seven taxa compared with it. Habit characters make this plant easily identified in the field. Taxonomic recognition for T. rugelii is justified. Further studies are required to determine to which rank it should be assigned.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trillium rugelii is sympatric with T. grandiftorum and T. cuneatum.

Taxon
Trillium rugeliiTrillium rugeliie0
Outcome
grows sympatrically with T. grandiftorum (Michx.) Salisb. and T. cuneatum Raf.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trillium rugelii
Trillium rugelii · TaxonKristof Zyskowski · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trillium rugelii grows sympatrically with T. grandiftorum (Michx.) Salisb. and T. cuneatum Raf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trillium rugelii is geographically isolated from T. flexipes and the T. erectum complex.

Outcome
geographically isolated from T. flexipes and members of the T. erectum complexe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it is geographically isolated from T. flexipes and members of the T. erectum complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karyotypes and scatter diagrams indicate close relationship to T. erectum var. album, T. simile, and probably T. flexipes.

Outcome
closely related to T. erectum var. album (Michx.) Pursh, T. simile Gleason, and probably to T. flexipese0
Comparator
T. erectum var. album (Michx.) Pursh, T. simile Gleason, and probably to T. flexipese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“this taxon is closely related to T. erectum var. album (Michx.) Pursh, T. simile Gleason, and probably to T. flexipes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–849 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual T. rugelii plants show distinct karyotypic variability.

Taxon
T. rugeliiTrillium rugeliie0
Outcome
distinct karyotypic variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trillium rugelii
Trillium rugelii · TaxonKristof Zyskowski · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is evidence of distinct karyotypic variability among individual plants in T. rugelii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–942 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No chromosome types were peculiar to T. rugelii.

Outcome
no chromosome types are peculiar to this taxone0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“no chromosome types are peculiar to this taxon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No compared taxon had plant karyotypes identical with T. rugelii.

Taxon
T. rugeliiTrillium rugeliie0
Outcome
no plant karyotypes (diploid sets) identicale0
Qualifier
among the seven taxa compared with ite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trillium rugelii
Trillium rugelii · TaxonKristof Zyskowski · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are no plant karyotypes (diploid sets) identical with those for T. rugelii among the seven taxa compared with it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Habit characters make T. rugelii readily identifiable in the field.

Outcome
easily identified in the fielde0
Qualifier
Habit characterse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Habit characters make this plant easily identified in the field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1184 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judge taxonomic recognition of T. rugelii justified.

Taxon
T. rugeliiTrillium rugeliie0
Outcome
Taxonomic recognition for T. rugeliie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trillium rugelii
Trillium rugelii · TaxonKristof Zyskowski · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Taxonomic recognition for T. rugelii is justified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1235 · show in text ↑