Paper · 2013 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effect of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) intercropping on weed biomass and maize ( Zea mays ) yield

K Jamshidi; A R Yousefi; M Oveisi

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ) density (0, 15 or 30 plants/m 2 ) and sowing date (15 days prior to maize sowing or simultaneously with maize), and of maize ( Zea mays ) planting density (7.5 or 9 plants/m 2 ) on weed biomass and maize crop yield. Results showed that increasing the maize density from 7.5 to 9 plants/m 2 reduced the weed biomass by 21.5%. Furthermore, cowpea acted as a living mulch, reducing weed biomass by up to 45.5% and 39.6% when intercropped with maize at a density of 7.5 and 9 plants/m 2 , respectively. Under weed‐free conditions, an increase in maize density from 7.5 to 9 plants/m 2 resulted in maize grain yield increasing from 8.92 to 9.40 t/ha; however, the addition of cowpea only increased the maize grain yield by about 4.2%, on average, under these conditions. By contrast, under weed‐infested conditions, there was a large decrease in maize grain yield (up to 32%), but intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease. Under weed‐free conditions, there was no effect of sowing date on maize grain yield; however, under weed‐infested conditions, yield was greater on the second sowing date. Thus, it is concluded that the planting of maize at a density of 9 plants/m 2 and simultaneously intercropping with cowpea at a density of 30 plants/m 2 could be an appropriate control measure for weed suppression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing maize density reduced weed biomass by 21.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
9 plants/m 2e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21.5%e0
Comparator
7.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the maize density from 7.5 to 9 plants/m 2 reduced the weed biomass by 21.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch reduced weed biomass by up to 45.5% at the lower maize density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
cowpeae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Second interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
45.5%e0
Qualifier
7.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · Second interactorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea acted as a living mulch, reducing weed biomass by up to 45.5% and 39.6% when intercropped with maize at a density of 7.5 and 9 plants/m 2 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea mulch reduced weed biomass by 39.6% at the higher maize density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
cowpeae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Second interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
39.6%e0
Qualifier
9 plants/m 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · Second interactorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea acted as a living mulch, reducing weed biomass by up to 45.5% and 39.6% when intercropped with maize at a density of 7.5 and 9 plants/m 2 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher maize density raised weed-free grain yield from 8.92 to 9.40 t/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
9 plants/m 2e0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
9.40 t/hae0
Qualifier
8.92e0
Comparator
7.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under weed‐free conditions, an increase in maize density from 7.5 to 9 plants/m 2 resulted in maize grain yield increasing from 8.92 to 9.40 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea increased maize yield by about 4.2% under weed-free conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
cowpeae0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.2%e0
Qualifier
under these conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of cowpea only increased the maize grain yield by about 4.2%, on average, under these conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation decreased maize grain yield by up to 32%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
weed‐infested conditionse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under weed‐infested conditions, there was a large decrease in maize grain yield (up to 32%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea intercropping limited the weed-related maize yield decrease to 16%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercropping with cowpeae0
Interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0other
Outcome
16% decreasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · InteractorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping with cowpea reduced this to only a 16% decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date did not affect weed-free maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sowing datee0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under weed‐free conditions, there was no effect of sowing date on maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under weed infestation, maize yield was greater on the second sowing date.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
second sowing datee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under weed‐infested conditions, yield was greater on the second sowing date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend dense maize planting simultaneous with cowpea intercropping for weed suppression.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
simultaneously intercropping with cowpea at a density of 30 plants/m 2e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed suppressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting of maize at a density of 9 plants/m 2 and simultaneously intercropping with cowpea at a density of 30 plants/m 2 could be an appropriate control measure for weed suppression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1417 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.