Abstract
An experiment was conducted at the Hill Agricultural Research Station, Khagrachari from May to November 2004 to find out the effect of planting time (1st week of June, July, August and September) and plant spacing (60 × 30 cm, 60 × 40 cm and 60 × 50 cm) on the yield and yield components of okra in hill slope condition during rainy season. The highest yield (12.53 t/ha) was obtained by the planting in July which was at par with June (11.69 t/ha). In case of plant spacing, the highest yield (9.02 t/ha) was recorded from close spacing at 60 x 30 cm that was statistically different from other two spacing and the widest spacing of 60 x 50 cm produced the lowest yield (8.06 t/ha). The treatment combination July sowing with 60 x 30 cm plant spacing produced significantly highest yield (12.86 t/ha).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/pa.v18i2.18161 Progress. Agric. 18(2): 67 - 73, 2007
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
July planting gave the highest okra yield, 12.53 t/ha, statistically at par with June planting at 11.69 t/ha.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse1 - Treatment
- planting in Julye0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 12.53 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 11.69 t/hae0
- Comparator
- Junee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield (12.53 t/ha) was obtained by the planting in July which was at par with June (11.69 t/ha).”
e1“yield and yield components of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Close 60 x 30 cm spacing gave the highest okra yield, 9.02 t/ha, significantly different from the other spacings.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- close spacing at 60 x 30 cme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 9.02 t/hae0
- Comparator
- other two spacinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest yield (9.02 t/ha) was recorded from close spacing at 60 x 30 cm that was statistically different from other two spacing”
e1“yield and yield components of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
The widest 60 x 50 cm spacing gave the lowest okra yield, 8.06 t/ha.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- widest spacing of 60 x 50 cme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 8.06 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the widest spacing of 60 x 50 cm produced the lowest yield (8.06 t/ha)”
e1“yield and yield components of okra”
Claim · model-written summary
July sowing combined with 60 x 30 cm spacing produced the significantly highest okra yield, 12.86 t/ha.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse1
- Treatment
- July sowing with 60 x 30 cm plant spacinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 12.86 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“July sowing with 60 x 30 cm plant spacing produced significantly highest yield (12.86 t/ha)”
e1“yield and yield components of okra”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →density · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.