Paper · 1987 · Ecology

Plant Community Diversity, Herbivore Movement, and an Insect‐Transmitted Disease of Maize

Alison G. Power

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
116
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out in Nicaragua to examine the influence of plant community diversity, plant density, and host plant quality on the spread of an insect-transmitted plant pathogen. Population levels of the corn leafhopper Dalbulus maidis, which transmits the corn stunt spiroplasma to maize, were monitored in four experimental communities; low-density maize monoculture, high-density maize monoculture, two-species (maize/bean) polyculture, and multispecies (maize/weeds) polyculture. Leafhopper abundance per plant and the incidence of corn stunt were lower in high-density maize monocultures than in low-density monocultures. Increasing plant diversity by intercropping with nonhost species such as beans or weeds also led to lower leafhooper abundance and decreased disease incidence, but the effect was not enhanced as additional nonhost species were added to the community. Manipulating host plant quality by increasing nitrogen fertilization resulted in higher leafhopper densities at higher nitrogen levels. To explore the role of vector movement in disease spread, leafhopper movement rates and emigration were estimated by observing changes in the spatial gradients of leafhopper densities over time. This method of movement analysis requires neither marking the insects nor releasing them at a single point, and thus reduces the extreme disturbance caused by traditional mark-release techniques. The analysis indicated that leafhopper movement rates were lowest in the polycultures. In particular, across-row movement was strikingly inhibited in the bean polyculture. This polyculture also had the highest rates of emigration. These results indicate that plant quality, density, and diversity significantly affect the spread of corn stunt through their effects on the abundance and movement behavior of the corn leafhopper. These factors could be manipulated in a program of cultural control for corn stunt in maize fields in tropical America.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density maize had lower leafhopper abundance than low-density maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
high-density maize monoculturese0
Interactor
corn leafhopperDalbulus maidise1peste0
Outcome
Leafhopper abundance per plante0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
low-density monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dalbulus maidis
Dalbulus maidis · InteractorJustin Williams · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafhopper abundance per plant and the incidence of corn stunt were lower in high-density maize monocultures than in low-density monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–643 · show in text ↑
e1

“the corn leafhopper Dalbulus maidis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density maize had lower corn stunt incidence than low-density maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
high-density maize monoculturese0
Interactor
corn stunte0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of corn stunte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
low-density monoculturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafhopper abundance per plant and the incidence of corn stunt were lower in high-density maize monocultures than in low-density monocultures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping maize with beans or weeds lowered leafhopper abundance.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercropping with nonhost species such as beans or weedse0
Outcome
leafhooper abundancee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing plant diversity by intercropping with nonhost species such as beans or weeds also led to lower leafhooper abundance and decreased disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping maize with beans or weeds decreased disease incidence.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
intercropping with nonhost species such as beans or weedse0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing plant diversity by intercropping with nonhost species such as beans or weeds also led to lower leafhooper abundance and decreased disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding further nonhost species did not enhance the diversity effect.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
additional nonhost speciese0
Outcome
the effecte0
Direction
not enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect was not enhanced as additional nonhost species were added to the community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen levels increased leafhopper densities.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
leafhopper densitiese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Manipulating host plant quality by increasing nitrogen fertilization resulted in higher leafhopper densities at higher nitrogen levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The movement analysis avoids marking and single-point release, reducing disturbance.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
extreme disturbancee0
Direction
reducese0
Comparator
traditional mark-release techniquese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This method of movement analysis requires neither marking the insects nor releasing them at a single point, and thus reduces the extreme disturbance caused by traditional mark-release techniques.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafhopper movement rates were lowest in polycultures.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
leafhopper movement ratese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leafhopper movement rates were lowest in the polycultures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across-row leafhopper movement was inhibited in bean polyculture.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
across-row movemente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“across-row movement was strikingly inhibited in the bean polyculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean polyculture had the highest leafhopper emigration rates.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
rates of emigratione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This polyculture also had the highest rates of emigration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose manipulating plant quality, density, and diversity for corn stunt cultural control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
cultural control for corn stunte0
Setting
tropical Americae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These factors could be manipulated in a program of cultural control for corn stunt in maize fields in tropical America.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1969 · show in text ↑

rotation · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

intercropping · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

intercropping · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.