Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Growth and Yield Response to Simulated Hail Damage in Guar

John W. Sij; Jason P. Ott; Brian L. S. Olson; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Hail damage can result in substantial economic loss to annual spring and summer crops. Crop insurance guidelines to assess hail damage on major crops are readily available to adjusters. However, research and guidelines to assess hail damage on minor crops is lacking and may limit their expansion. A dryland field study with guar [ Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] was designed to determine the effect of simulated hail damage at two growth stages and three levels of defoliation on plant regrowth and bean yield. Experiments were conducted on a Miles fine sandy loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, superactive, thermic Typic Paleustalfs) near Vernon, TX, from 2001 through 2003. A commercial grass trimmer was used to simulate hail damage by flailing plants to targeted defoliations levels of 33, 66, and 90% at 6 and 12 wk after emergence (WAE). Both final plant height and yield were reduced to a greater extent when plants were damaged at 12 WAE (grain‐fill period) than at 6 WAE (early flowering). Regression analysis from data combined over years showed that guar yields were reduced 50% with a 66% defoliation level at 6 WAE, but required only 42% defoliation to reduce yield levels 50% with late‐season defoliation. This is the first report of using a grass trimmer to simulate hail damage by shredding plant material rather than manually removing plants and plant parts. Results from this study also provide a basis for producers and insurance adjusters to quantify and estimate economic losses in guar due to hail damage at two growth stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late damage reduced final height more than early damage.

Treatment
damaged at 12 WAEe0
Outcome
final plant heighte0
Direction
reduced to a greater extente0
Comparator
6 WAEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both final plant height and yield were reduced to a greater extent when plants were damaged at 12 WAE (grain‐fill period) than at 6 WAE (early flowering).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late damage reduced yield more than early damage.

Treatment
damaged at 12 WAEe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reduced to a greater extente0
Comparator
6 WAEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both final plant height and yield were reduced to a greater extent when plants were damaged at 12 WAE (grain‐fill period) than at 6 WAE (early flowering).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 WAE, 66% defoliation reduced yield 50%.

Treatment
66% defoliation level at 6 WAEe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“guar yields were reduced 50% with a 66% defoliation level at 6 WAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For late defoliation, 42% defoliation reduced yield 50%.

Treatment
42% defoliatione0
Outcome
yield levelse0
Direction
reducee0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
late‐season defoliatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“required only 42% defoliation to reduce yield levels 50% with late‐season defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A grass trimmer can simulate hail damage by shredding plant material.

Outcome
simulate hail damagee0
Comparator
manually removing plants and plant partse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This is the first report of using a grass trimmer to simulate hail damage by shredding plant material rather than manually removing plants and plant parts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.