Paper · 1968 · Annals of Applied Biology

The incidence of virus diseases in English sweet‐cherry orchards and their effect on yield

A. F. POSNETTE; R. CROPLEY; A. A. J. SWAIT

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Two thousand sweet‐cherry trees ( Prunus avium ) in English orchards were tested for virus infection by using Lambert and Mazzard F 12/1 as indicators. Most trees of varieties commonly grown before 1920 were infected with more than one virus, usually little cherry (69%) and necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf (56%). Other infection was less prevalent, 35% of these trees having European rusty mottle, 30% ring mottle and 3% necrotic rusty mottle. Most trees of varieties introduced since 1920 were virus‐free (61%) but some had become infected with each of these viruses except necrotic rusty mottle. In a field trial of 12 years duration the yield of three varieties was diminished by infection with necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf, rugose mosaic, rusty mottle, ring mottle and necrotic line pattern. The effect of rusty mottle was due to growth suppression resulting in smaller trees, but that of other viruses was also due to impaired fertility. The yield of one variety (Merton Heart) was greatly enhanced by infection with rugose mosaic, rusty mottle and necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf viruses. The high incidence of virus infection and consequent yield depression has probably diminished the potential yield by at least 30% and contributed to the decline in acreage of sweet cherries in England.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older sweet cherry varieties commonly carried multiple viruses.

Material
varieties commonly grown before 1920e0
Outcome
infected with more than one viruse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Most trees of varieties commonly grown before 1920 were infected with more than one virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 160–249 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Little cherry infected 69% of older trees.

Interactor
little cherrye0pathogen
Outcome
little cherrye0
Value
69%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“usually little cherry (69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf infected 56% of older trees.

Interactor
necrotic ringspot/prune dwarfe0pathogen
Outcome
necrotic ringspot/prune dwarfe0
Value
56%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf (56%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

European rusty mottle infected 35% of older trees.

Interactor
European rusty mottlee0pathogen
Outcome
European rusty mottlee0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“35% of these trees having European rusty mottle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ring mottle infected 30% of older trees.

Interactor
ring mottlee0pathogen
Outcome
ring mottlee0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“30% ring mottle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Necrotic rusty mottle infected 3% of older trees.

Interactor
necrotic rusty mottlee0pathogen
Outcome
necrotic rusty mottlee0
Value
3%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“3% necrotic rusty mottle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most newer varieties were virus free.

Material
varieties introduced since 1920e0
Outcome
virus‐freee0
Value
61%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Most trees of varieties introduced since 1920 were virus‐free (61%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Newer varieties contracted all listed viruses except necrotic rusty mottle.

Outcome
infected with each of these viruses except necrotic rusty mottlee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“some had become infected with each of these viruses except necrotic rusty mottle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several virus infections diminished yield in three varieties.

Interactor
necrotic ringspot/prune dwarfe0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
diminishede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of three varieties was diminished by infection with necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf, rugose mosaic, rusty mottle, ring mottle and necrotic line pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rusty mottle reduced growth and tree size.

Interactor
rusty mottlee0pathogen
Outcome
smaller treese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of rusty mottle was due to growth suppression resulting in smaller trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other viruses also impaired fertility.

Interactor
other virusese0pathogen
Outcome
impaired fertilitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“that of other viruses was also due to impaired fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection enhanced yield of Merton Heart.

Material
Merton Hearte0
Interactor
rugose mosaice0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of one variety (Merton Heart) was greatly enhanced by infection with rugose mosaic, rusty mottle and necrotic ringspot/prune dwarf viruses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus infection probably reduced potential yield by at least 30%.

Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
potential yielde0
Direction
diminishede0
Value
at least 30%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“virus infection and consequent yield depression has probably diminished the potential yield by at least 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet‐cherry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 · show in text ↑