Paper · 2006 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Biomass and yield performance of kabuli chickpea cultivars with the fern or unifoliate leaf trait in the Northern Great Plains

Lin Li; Rosalind A Bueckert; Yantai Gan; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) has two kinds of leaf types, the fern and unifoliate. The best leaf type to use for biomass production and yield in the short growing season of the Northern Great Plains, which has a semiarid environment with end of season rainfall, is not yet known. The objectives of this research were to determine the relationships between leaf type and crop growth rate, maximum above-ground biomass, harvest index and yield under moderate and high plant population densities. The study was conducted in the field at Saskatoon and Swift Current, Saskatchewan, in 2003 and 2004. The experimental treatments consisted of a factorial combination of six commercial kabuli chickpea cultivars representing the two leaf types and two plant population densities: 45 and 85 plants m -2 . There were no cultivar and plant population interactions for crop growth rate, maximum above-ground biomass, harvest index and seed yield. Dry matter production was higher in the 2004 season, which had above-average rainfall and a longer duration of reproductive growth. Although high plant population exhibited higher maximum above-ground biomass in 3 location-years, plant population did not affect the crop growth rate. The 45 plants m -2 treatment had a higher harvest index than the 85 plants m -2 treatment in 2 location-years, but both population treatments were similar in the other two environments. Yield of chickpea was increased by higher plant population in 1 location-year, but was not affected by plant population in the other location-years. The fern leaf cultivars had a higher crop growth rate over the unifoliate leaf cultivars in 2 location-years and no significant difference in the other environment. Fern-leaf cultivars partitioned more dry matter to seed growth compared with unifoliate cultivars while sustaining similar biomass production as unifoliate cultivars. The use of fern-leaf cultivars in the Northern Great Plains appears to be an opportunity for increasing chickpea yield by its superior harvest index compared with unifoliate leaf cultivars. Key words: Cicer arietinum, fern leaf, unifoliate, plant population, seed yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and plant density did not interact for crop growth rate, biomass, harvest index, or seed yield.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
no cultivar and plant population interactions for crop growth rate, maximum above-ground biomass, harvest index and seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no cultivar and plant population interactions for crop growth rate, maximum above-ground biomass, harvest index and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter production was higher in the wetter 2004 season.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
Dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Setting
2004 seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter production was higher in the 2004 season, which had above-average rainfall and a longer duration of reproductive growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High population increased maximum above-ground biomass in three location-years.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
high plant populatione0
Outcome
maximum above-ground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
3 location-yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high plant population exhibited higher maximum above-ground biomass in 3 location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population density did not affect crop growth rate.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant populatione0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant population did not affect the crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower density had higher harvest index in two location-years.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
45 plants m -2 treatmente0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2 location-yearse0
Comparator
85 plants m -2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 45 plants m -2 treatment had a higher harvest index than the 85 plants m -2 treatment in 2 location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was similar between densities in the other two environments.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
both population treatmentse0
Outcome
harvest indext1
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both population treatments were similar in the other two environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
t1

“higher harvest index than the 85 plants m -2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher population increased yield in one location-year.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
higher plant populatione0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
1 location-yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of chickpea was increased by higher plant population in 1 location-year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Population density did not affect yield in the remaining location-years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
plant populatione0
Outcome
Yieldt1
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not affected by plant population in the other location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
t1

“Yield of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1423 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fern leaf cultivars had higher crop growth rate in two location-years.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
fern leaf cultivarse0
Outcome
crop growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2 location-yearse0
Comparator
unifoliate leaf cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fern leaf cultivars had a higher crop growth rate over the unifoliate leaf cultivars in 2 location-years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf types did not differ significantly in crop growth rate in the other environment.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
crop growth ratet1
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in the other environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
t1

“higher crop growth rate over the unifoliate leaf cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1643 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fern leaf cultivars partitioned more dry matter to seed than unifoliate cultivars.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Fern-leaf cultivarse0
Outcome
dry matter to seed growthe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
unifoliate cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fern-leaf cultivars partitioned more dry matter to seed growth compared with unifoliate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fern leaf cultivars sustained similar biomass to unifoliate cultivars.

Taxon
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
fern-leaf cultivarst1
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
unifoliate cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sustaining similar biomass production as unifoliate cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1824–1885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fern-leaf cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1739 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest fern leaf cultivars may increase chickpea yield in the Northern Great Plains because of superior harvest index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
use of fern-leaf cultivars in the Northern Great Plainse0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of fern-leaf cultivars in the Northern Great Plains appears to be an opportunity for increasing chickpea yield by its superior harvest index compared with unifoliate leaf cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2076 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

density · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 64 positive, 7 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.