Paper · 1993 · jpa

Effect of Tillage on Cotton Plant Populations and Seedling Diseases

P. D. Colyer; P. R. Vernon

16
claims
30
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tillage practices can affect the growth of plants and the development of plant diseases. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of tillage on cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) stand establishment, seed cotton yield, and seedling diseases. Three tillage practices (conservation, moldboard, and conventional) were evaluated for their effects on plant populations and the development of cotton seedling diseases on a Norwood fine sandy loam soil (fine‐silty, mixed, calcareous, thermic Typic Udifluvent). Each tillage plot was divided into two subplots, with and without the application of Temik (2‐ Methyl ‐2‐( methylthio ) propanal O ‐[( methylamino ) carbonyl ]oxime) + Terraclor Super X (10% pentachloronitrobenzene [PCNB] + 2.5% etridiazol) (TSX). Plant populations were determined at 4 wk. Seedling disease was assessed at 4 wk by rating 20 surviving seedlings for root/hypocotyl necrosis. Yield of seed cotton was determined at plant maturity. Tillage practice significantly affected plant population 3 yr., while application of Temik + TSX affected populations in 1 yr. Generally, plant populations were lowest in the conservation tillage plots. Disease index was influenced by both tillage and application of Temik + TSX. Infurrow application of Temik + TSX resulted in lower disease indices all 4 yr. The conservation tillage plots had the highest disease index in 1990; however, disease indices were not significantly different in 1989 and 1991. Application of Temik + TSX resulted in higher yield every year except 1990. The influence of tillage practices on yield of seed cotton was variable each year and no trend was observed. Research Question Cotton farmers have become more interested in conservation tillage cotton production. Conservation tillage, however, can increase the incidence and severity of some diseases. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of three tillage practices, conservation, conventional, and moldboard, with and without the application of an in‐furrow fungicide + nematocide/insecticide on plant populations and root necrosis. Literature Summary Several studies on conservation tillage of cotton have been published. Most of these reports involve reduced tillage following cover crops. These reports describe variable results on yield and little information on the incidence and severity of cotton seedling diseases. Study Description The study was conducted in northwestern Louisiana on a Norwood very fine sandy loam soil (fine‐silty, mixed, calcareous, thermic Typic Udifluvent) from 1988 to 1991. Applied Question What is the effect of conservation tillage on cotton seedling diseases and production? Stand establishment and the severity of seedling diseases as determined by a root and hypocotyl disease index is influenced by tillage; however, in some years environmental conditions may negate the effect of tillage. Generally, seedling diseases are more severe under cool, wet conditions. In 1988 and 1990, plant populations were reduced and disease index was greater under conservation tillage than conventional tillage and moldboard plowing. Plant population and disease index among tillage practices were not significantly different in 1989, a dry year. In 1991, a wet year, plant population, but not root and hypocotyl disease index, was significantly different among tillage practices. Yield among tillage practices was variable, and is probably related to chemical and physical properties of the soil that were not measured in this study. What was the effect of the fungicide + insecticide/nematocide? Application of Temik + TSX improved plant population 1 yr, reduced root disease index all 4 yr, and improved yield of seed cotton 3 of 4 yr. The application of a fungicide + insecticide/nematocide is recommended for conservation tillage in cotton to reduce seedling diseases and improve yields. Four‐year average of plant population, disease index, and yield of seed cotton. Plant Disease Seed cotton population index (lb/acre) Tillage practice + − + − + − Conventional 129 121 1.3 2.0 2004 1626 Moldboard 115 109 1.4 1.8 2089 1736 Conservation 82 72 1.5 2.2 1938 1579 Number of plants per 50 ft of row. On a scale of 0–4, where 0 = no necrosis, 1 = <33%, 2 = 33–66%, 3 = 67–100% necrosis, 4 = dead taproot. + = with Temik + TSX; − = without Temik + TSX.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage significantly affected cotton plant population in three years.

Treatment
Tillage practicee0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Value
3 yre0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage practice significantly affected plant population 3 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temik plus TSX affected populations in one year.

Treatment
Temik + TSXe0
Outcome
populationse0
Value
1 yre0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Temik + TSX affected populations in 1 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage generally had the lowest plant populations.

Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
plant populationse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, plant populations were lowest in the conservation tillage plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and Temik plus TSX influenced disease index.

Treatment
tillage and application of Temik + TSXe0
Outcome
Disease indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Disease index was influenced by both tillage and application of Temik + TSX.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temik plus TSX lowered disease indices all four years.

Treatment
Infurrow application of Temik + TSXe0
Outcome
disease indicese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infurrow application of Temik + TSX resulted in lower disease indices all 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage had the highest disease index in 1990.

Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
1990e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conservation tillage plots had the highest disease index in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease indices did not differ significantly in 1989 and 1991.

Outcome
disease indicese0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease indices were not significantly different in 1989 and 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temik plus TSX increased yield every year except 1990.

Treatment
Temik + TSXe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
every year except 1990e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Temik + TSX resulted in higher yield every year except 1990.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage effects on seed cotton yield varied annually with no trend.

Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
yield of seed cottone0
Direction
no trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of tillage practices on yield of seed cotton was variable each year and no trend was observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage reduced populations in 1988 and 1990.

Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
plant populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
1988 and 1990e0
Comparator
conventional tillage and moldboard plowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1988 and 1990, plant populations were reduced and disease index was greater under conservation tillage than conventional tillage and moldboard plowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2961–3115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage increased disease index in 1988 and 1990.

Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
1988 and 1990e0
Comparator
conventional tillage and moldboard plowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1988 and 1990, plant populations were reduced and disease index was greater under conservation tillage than conventional tillage and moldboard plowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2961–3115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage groups did not differ significantly in population in dry 1989.

Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
Plant populatione0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
1989, a dry yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population and disease index among tillage practices were not significantly different in 1989, a dry year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3116–3228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage groups did not differ significantly in disease index in dry 1989.

Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
1989, a dry yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population and disease index among tillage practices were not significantly different in 1989, a dry year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3116–3228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage populations differed significantly in wet 1991.

Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
plant populatione0
Qualifier
1991, a wet yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1991, a wet year, plant population, but not root and hypocotyl disease index, was significantly different among tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3229–3362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage disease indices did not differ significantly in wet 1991.

Treatment
tillage practicese0
Outcome
root and hypocotyl disease indexe0
Qualifier
1991, a wet yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1991, a wet year, plant population, but not root and hypocotyl disease index, was significantly different among tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3229–3362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–27 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Temik plus TSX is recommended in conservation tillage.

Treatment
fungicide + insecticide/nematocidee0
Outcome
reduce seedling diseases and improve yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of a fungicide + insecticide/nematocide is recommended for conservation tillage in cotton to reduce seedling diseases and improve yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3721–3874 · show in text ↑

tillage · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.