Paper · 1988 · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Cytogenetic studies in Papaver L.; the x= 6 and x= 7 diploids

J. J. B. GILL; A. CAINE

13
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Although hybridization between species in Papaver is difficult, a combination of karyotypic and genomic analysis has allowed the definition of up to six, apparently independent genomes, in the 2n= 12 and 1n= 14 diploids. In the 2n= 14 group there is considerable karyotypic differentiation and karyotypes off. atlanticum and P. hybridum are sufficiently dissimilar from each other and from the rest to allow the recognition of the two genomes as unique although no hybrids with other x= 7 diploids were produced. The genome of P. atlanticum is defined as C7C7 and that of P. hybridum H7H7.P. alpinum and P. rhaeticum only hybridized successfully with each other and the near perfect bivalent formation in their hybrid, together with the extreme similarity of their karyotypes, suggests that they are very closely related. They are designated J7J7. All the other x=7 diploids are karyotypically similar and the analysis of meiosis in their hybrids demonstrates thay they all share the same genome to some extent. There is however some differentiation among them. P. commutatum, P. glaucum, P. macrostemum and P. rhoeas are genomically very similar and all can be regarded as A7A7. P.fugax and P. tauricola appear to share an identical genome, partially differentiated from A7A7 and are defined as A27A27 while P. postii, although showing some little homology with A7A7 is sufficiently differentiated from it to be regarded as more distant than A27A27 and is described as A37A37. Although no hybrids between the two 2n= 12 diploids P. apulum and P.pavoninum were produced their karyotypes are sufficiently different to be individually recognized. The only hybrid produced between the x= 6 and x= 7 groups (P. apulum×P. hybridum) showed no homology between the chromosomes of the two genomes and, although this may not be true for any other x=6/x=7 combinations it is best to recognize the two x= 6 genomes as independent of the x= 7. The genome of P. apulum is thus regarded as I6I6 and that of P. pavoninum as P6P6.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karyotypic and genomic analysis defined up to six apparently independent genomes in diploid Papaver.

Taxon
PapaverPapavert0
Outcome
apparently independent genomese0
Value
up to sixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver
Papaver · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of karyotypic and genomic analysis has allowed the definition of up to six, apparently independent genomes, in the 2n= 12 and 1n= 14 diploids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Papaver”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. atlanticum has a distinct C7C7 genome.

Taxon
P. atlanticumPapaver atlanticume0
Outcome
genomee0
Qualifier
C7C7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver atlanticum
Papaver atlanticum · TaxonUser:SB_Johnny · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genome of P. atlanticum is defined as C7C7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. hybridum has a distinct H7H7 genome.

Taxon
P. hybridumPapaver hybridume0
Outcome
H7H7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver hybridum
Papaver hybridum · Taxon( Hans Hillewaert ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and that of P. hybridum H7H7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–589 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. alpinum and P. rhaeticum hybridized only with each other and were closely related.

Taxon
P. alpinum and P. rhaeticumOreomecon alpinaPapaver rhaeticume0
Outcome
only hybridized successfully with each othere0
Qualifier
very closely relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oreomecon alpina
Oreomecon alpina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRossenGo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Papaver rhaeticum
Papaver rhaeticum · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. alpinum and P. rhaeticum only hybridized successfully with each other and the near perfect bivalent formation in their hybrid, together with the extreme similarity of their karyotypes, suggests that they are very closely related.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. alpinum and P. rhaeticum were designated J7J7.

Taxon
P. alpinum and P. rhaeticumOreomecon alpinaPapaver rhaeticume1
Outcome
J7J7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oreomecon alpina
Oreomecon alpina · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRossenGo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Papaver rhaeticum
Papaver rhaeticum · TaxonBernd Haynold · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They are designated J7J7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Papaver”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. alpinum and P. rhaeticum only hybridized successfully with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–661 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other x=7 diploids shared a genome to some extent.

Taxon
PapaverPapavert0
Outcome
share the same genome to some extente0
Qualifier
in their hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver
Papaver · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the analysis of meiosis in their hybrids demonstrates thay they all share the same genome to some extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Papaver”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. commutatum, P. glaucum, P. macrostemum and P. rhoeas were genomically very similar and assigned A7A7.

Taxon
P. commutatum, P. glaucum, P. macrostemum and P. rhoease0
Outcome
genomically very similare0
Qualifier
A7A7e0

Verbatim

e0

“P. commutatum, P. glaucum, P. macrostemum and P. rhoeas are genomically very similar and all can be regarded as A7A7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1179 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fugax and P. tauricola shared an apparently identical A27A27 genome.

Outcome
identical genomee0
Qualifier
A27A27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Papaver persicum subsp. tauricola
Papaver persicum subsp. tauricola · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Papaver fugax
Papaver fugax · TaxonAndr Hospr · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P.fugax and P. tauricola appear to share an identical genome, partially differentiated from A7A7 and are defined as A27A27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. postii was more differentiated than A27A27 and was assigned A37A37.

Taxon
P. postiiPapaver postiie0
Outcome
more distant than A27A27e0
Qualifier
A37A37e0

Verbatim

e0

“P. postii, although showing some little homology with A7A7 is sufficiently differentiated from it to be regarded as more distant than A27A27 and is described as A37A37.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1477 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. apulum and P. pavoninum had distinguishable karyotypes.

Taxon
P. apulum and P.pavoninumRoemeria apulaRoemeria pavoninae0
Outcome
karyotypes are sufficiently differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roemeria apula
Roemeria apula · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Roemeria pavonina
Roemeria pavonina · TaxonNasser Halaweh · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. apulum and P.pavoninum were produced their karyotypes are sufficiently different to be individually recognized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P. apulum × P. hybridum hybrid showed no homology between parental chromosomes.

Taxon
P. apulum×P. hybridumRoemeria apulae0
Outcome
no homology between the chromosomese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roemeria apula
Roemeria apula · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The only hybrid produced between the x= 6 and x= 7 groups (P. apulum×P. hybridum) showed no homology between the chromosomes of the two genomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. apulum was assigned I6I6.

Taxon
P. apulumRoemeria apulae0
Outcome
I6I6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roemeria apula
Roemeria apula · TaxonJörg Hempel · CC BY-SA 3.0 de · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genome of P. apulum is thus regarded as I6I6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–1980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. pavoninum was assigned P6P6.

Taxon
P. pavoninumRoemeria pavoninae0
Outcome
P6P6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Roemeria pavonina
Roemeria pavonina · TaxonNasser Halaweh · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and that of P. pavoninum as P6P6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1981–2014 · show in text ↑