Paper · 1997 · Plant Disease

Benefits of Applications of Chlorothalonil for the Control of Black Mold of Tomato

R. M. Davis; E. M. Miyao; R. J. Mullen; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chlorothalonil was applied 2, 4, 6, 2 and 4, or 4 and 6 weeks prior to tomato harvest in fields in four counties in California over a 3-year period to assess the economic benefits of chlorothalonil applications, if any, on the reduction of black mold caused by Alternaria alternata. The percentage of visually infected fruit was significantly reduced across all four sites in 2 of the 3 years. At one location, the incidence of black mold was reduced over 50% in all 3 years of the study by a single application of the fungicide. Overall, the mean yield of marketable fruit was 79.8 metric tons per hectare. An average of 5.1% of the fruit harvested in all locations and years had visible symptoms of black mold. Generally, the most effective treatment was a single application of the fungicide 6 weeks before harvest, with no further benefit from a second application of the fungicide. Based on the cost of the fungicide and its application, a single dose of chlorothalonil applied to plots in Solano County, where the highest incidence of disease occurred, would net the grower $160.47 return per hectare. The application of fungicide resulted in significant economic benefits in tests in two of the counties, where the disease is historically a problem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil significantly reduced the percentage of visibly infected tomato fruit across four sites in 2 of 3 years.

Treatment
Chlorothalonile0
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae7pathogen
Outcome
percentage of visually infected fruite1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
in 2 of the 3 yearse1
Setting
four counties in Californiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorothalonil was applied 2, 4, 6, 2 and 4, or 4 and 6 weeks prior to tomato harvest in fields in four counties in California”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e7

“black mold caused by Alternaria alternata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–281 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percentage of visually infected fruit was significantly reduced across all four sites in 2 of the 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single chlorothalonil application reduced black mold incidence by over 50% at one location in all 3 years.

Treatment
a single application of the fungicidee2
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae7pathogen
Outcome
incidence of black molde2
Direction
reducede2
Value
over 50%e2
Setting
one locatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“black mold caused by Alternaria alternata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–281 · show in text ↑
e2

“At one location, the incidence of black mold was reduced over 50% in all 3 years of the study by a single application of the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean yield of marketable tomato fruit was 79.8 metric tons per hectare.

Outcome
mean yield of marketable fruite3
Value
79.8 metric tons per hectaree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Overall, the mean yield of marketable fruit was 79.8 metric tons per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–606 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On average 5.1% of harvested fruit had visible black mold symptoms.

Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae7pathogen
Outcome
visible symptoms of black molde4
Value
5.1%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“black mold caused by Alternaria alternata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–281 · show in text ↑
e4

“An average of 5.1% of the fruit harvested in all locations and years had visible symptoms of black mold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single fungicide application six weeks before harvest was the most effective treatment.

Treatment
a single application of the fungicide 6 weeks before harveste5
Outcome
most effective treatmente5
Direction
most effectivee5
Comparator
a second application of the fungicidee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Generally, the most effective treatment was a single application of the fungicide 6 weeks before harvest, with no further benefit from a second application of the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second fungicide application gave no further benefit over a single application six weeks before harvest.

Treatment
a second application of the fungicidee5
Outcome
benefite5
Direction
no furthere5
Comparator
a single application of the fungicide 6 weeks before harveste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Generally, the most effective treatment was a single application of the fungicide 6 weeks before harvest, with no further benefit from a second application of the fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–885 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A single chlorothalonil dose in Solano County would return $160.47 per hectare to the grower.

Outcome
return per hectaree6
Value
$160.47e6
Setting
Solano Countye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Based on the cost of the fungicide and its application, a single dose of chlorothalonil applied to plots in Solano County, where the highest incidence of disease occurred, would net the grower $160.47 return per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide gave significant economic benefits in two of the counties.

Treatment
application of fungicidee7
Outcome
economic benefitse7
Setting
two of the countiese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Black Mold of Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“The application of fungicide resulted in significant economic benefits in tests in two of the counties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1210 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Alternaria alternata · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.