Paper · 1994 · Crop Science

Genetic Variation and Relationship of Quality Traits between Herbage and Seed of Tall Fescue

Daniel R. Pavetti; David A. Sleper; Craig A. Roberts; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Information is lacking on inheritance of in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and hemicellulose (HEM) of tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) seed and their relationship to these quality traits in herbage. if a close relationship were found between seed and herbage quality, indirect selection for improved herbage quality would be effective. Objectives of this study were to evaluate genetic variation for these quality traits and yield of herbage and seed and to examine association of these quality parameters between seed and herbage. Twenty‐three endophyte‐free parents were randomly chosen from a genetically broad‐based population, and their respective half‐sib families were generated. Herbage and seed samples were analyzed for quality parameters using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Significant ( P < 0.01) variation was observed in herbage for all traits in the summer (immediately after seed harvest) and the fall for parents. There was no significant variation for IVDMD of herbage in summer or fall or for NDF and ADF in the summer for half‐sib families. For seed, all traits had highly significant variation. Narrow‐sense heritabilities for herbage ranged from 0% for IVDMD, NDF, and yield in the summer to 71% for HEM in the summer. Narrow‐sense heritability of IVDMD for seed was 78%. Heritabilities from herbage estimated by genotypic regressions were higher, ranging from 26% for IVDMD in the summer to 80% for NDF. Seed traits had a similar relationship, with genotypic regression heritabilities ranging from 62% for IVDMD to 86% for NDF. Correlation coefficients of quality traits between herbage and seed were low. Data indicated that indirect selection for improved forage quality via the seed is not useful. Selection for herbage quality directly would also be difficult because gains from selection were low.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parents showed significant variation in all herbage traits in summer and fall.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Material
parentse1
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
variatione1
Qualifier
summer (immediately after seed harvest) and the falle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant ( P < 0.01) variation was observed in herbage for all traits in the summer (immediately after seed harvest) and the fall for parents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1017 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-sib families showed no significant variation in herbage IVDMD in summer or fall.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Material
half‐sib familiese1
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
IVDMD of herbagee1
Qualifier
summer or falle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant variation for IVDMD of herbage in summer or fall or for NDF and ADF in the summer for half‐sib families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-sib families showed no significant variation in summer herbage NDF and ADF.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Material
half‐sib familiese1
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
NDF and ADFe1
Qualifier
in the summere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant variation for IVDMD of herbage in summer or fall or for NDF and ADF in the summer for half‐sib families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All measured seed quality traits varied highly significantly.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
seede1
Outcome
all traitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“For seed, all traits had highly significant variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1202 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer herbage IVDMD, NDF, and yield had 0% narrow-sense heritability.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
IVDMD, NDF, and yielde1
Value
0%e1
Qualifier
in the summere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Narrow‐sense heritabilities for herbage ranged from 0% for IVDMD, NDF, and yield in the summer to 71% for HEM in the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer herbage HEM had 71% narrow-sense heritability.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
HEMe1
Value
71%e1
Qualifier
in the summere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Narrow‐sense heritabilities for herbage ranged from 0% for IVDMD, NDF, and yield in the summer to 71% for HEM in the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1327 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed IVDMD had 78% narrow-sense heritability.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
seede1
Outcome
IVDMDe1
Value
78%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Narrow‐sense heritability of IVDMD for seed was 78%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic-regression heritability of summer herbage IVDMD was 26%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
IVDMDe1
Value
26%e1
Qualifier
in the summere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heritabilities from herbage estimated by genotypic regressions were higher, ranging from 26% for IVDMD in the summer to 80% for NDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic-regression heritability of herbage NDF was 80%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Outcome
NDFe1
Value
80%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heritabilities from herbage estimated by genotypic regressions were higher, ranging from 26% for IVDMD in the summer to 80% for NDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic-regression heritability of seed IVDMD was 62%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
Seede1
Outcome
IVDMDe1
Value
62%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed traits had a similar relationship, with genotypic regression heritabilities ranging from 62% for IVDMD to 86% for NDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic-regression heritability of seed NDF was 86%.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
Seede1
Outcome
NDFe1
Value
86%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed traits had a similar relationship, with genotypic regression heritabilities ranging from 62% for IVDMD to 86% for NDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1637 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed and herbage quality traits had low correlation coefficients.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
herbage and seede1
Outcome
Correlation coefficients of quality traitse1
Direction
lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Correlation coefficients of quality traits between herbage and seed were low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1715 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that selecting seed quality is not useful for improving forage quality.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
indirect selection for improved forage quality via the seed is not usefule1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“indirect selection for improved forage quality via the seed is not useful”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1810 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that direct selection for herbage quality would be difficult because gains were low.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
Selection for herbage quality directly would also be difficulte1
Qualifier
gains from selection were lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–212 · show in text ↑
e1

“Selection for herbage quality directly would also be difficult because gains from selection were low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1912 · show in text ↑