Paper · 2012 · 2012 First International Conference on Agro- Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics)

Rmote sensing of leaf water content for winter wheat using grey relational analysis (GRA), stepwise regression method (SRM) and partial least squares (PLS)

Xiuliang Jin; Xinguang Xu

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leaf water content (LWC) is an important parameter for evaluating crop health and predicting crop yield. The objective of this study was to compare two methods for the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat by combining stepwise regression method and partial least squares (SRM-PLS) or PLS based on the relational degree of grey relational analysis (GRA) between water vegetation indexes (WVIs) and LWC. Firstly, using data from 2008 was utilized to analyze the grey relationships between LWC and the selected typical water vegetation indices (WVIs) to determined the sensitivity of different WVIs to LWC. Secondly, the two methods of estimating LWC in winter wheat were compared, one was to directly use PLS and the other was to combine SRM-PLS based on the sensitive WVIs was selected by GRA between WVIs and LWC, and then the method with the highest determination coefficient (R 2 ) and lowest root mean square error (RMSE) was selected to estimate LWC in winter wheat. The results showed that the relationships between the first five WVI and LWC were stable by using GRA, and then LWC was estimated by using PLS and SRM-PLS at anthesis for winter wheat with 0.63 and 0.46. To validate two model estimation accuracy by using 2009 data, we compared actual value with predicted value by using PLS and SRM-PLS and RMSEs were 2.6 % and 3.12 %, respectively. The results indicated that the estimation accuracy of LWC could be improved by using GRA firstly and then by using PLS and SRM-PLS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLS estimated leaf water content of winter wheat at anthesis with a value of 0.63.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
anthesise1
Outcome
LWCe1
Value
0.63e1
Qualifier
PLSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“LWC was estimated by using PLS and SRM-PLS at anthesis for winter wheat with 0.63 and 0.46”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1180 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRM-PLS estimated leaf water content of winter wheat at anthesis with a value of 0.46.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
anthesise1
Outcome
LWCe1
Value
0.46e1
Qualifier
SRM-PLSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e1

“LWC was estimated by using PLS and SRM-PLS at anthesis for winter wheat with 0.63 and 0.46”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1180 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In validation with 2009 data, the PLS model had a root mean square error of 2.6 %.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
RMSEse2
Value
2.6 %e2
Qualifier
PLSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“To validate two model estimation accuracy by using 2009 data, we compared actual value with predicted value by using PLS and SRM-PLS and RMSEs were 2.6 % and 3.12 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1360 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In validation with 2009 data, the SRM-PLS model had a root mean square error of 3.12 %.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
RMSEse2
Value
3.12 %e2
Qualifier
SRM-PLSe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e2

“To validate two model estimation accuracy by using 2009 data, we compared actual value with predicted value by using PLS and SRM-PLS and RMSEs were 2.6 % and 3.12 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1360 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using GRA first improved the estimation accuracy of leaf water content in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
using GRA firstlye3
Outcome
estimation accuracy of LWCe3
Direction
improvede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e3

“the estimation accuracy of LWC could be improved by using GRA firstly and then by using PLS and SRM-PLS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1492 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relationships between the first five water vegetation indices and leaf water content were stable under GRA.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
GRAe4
Outcome
the relationships between the first five WVI and LWCe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the precision of estimating LWC in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–211 · show in text ↑
e4

“the relationships between the first five WVI and LWC were stable by using GRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1079 · show in text ↑