Abstract
Field experiments were conducted in 2000 and 2001 to determine the effects of the number of fungicide applications and resistant cultivars on early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola) of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) grown in strip-tillage versus conventional tillage. Split-plot experiments with four replications of cultivars and fungicide treatments were conducted in commercial fields using strip-tillage and conventional-tillage practices in Worth Co., GA. Main treatments consisted of cultivars Georgia Green and Florida MDR-98 in both years with the addition of C-99R in 2001. Sub-plot treatments were two fungicide treatments: (i) azoxystrobin (AZO) 0.33 kg/ha (sprays 3 and 5) and chlorothalonil (CHL) 1.26 kg/ha (all other sprays), applied at 14-day intervals; and (ii) AZO 0.33 kg/ha (sprays 2 and 4) and CHL 1.26 kg/ha (all other sprays), applied at 21- to 28-day intervals. Leaf spot ratings were 2.3 and 4.4 for Georgia Green and 1.9 and 3.3 for Florida MDR-98 (LSD = 0.4) for treatments 1 and 2, respectively, in conventional-tillage plots, and 2.1 and 2.9 for Georgia Green and 2.3 and 1.7 for Florida MDR (LSD = 0.2) in strip-tillage plots, respectively, in 2001. Lower levels of leaf spot severity in large strip-tilled plots of resistant cultivars were similar to results observed in small plot experiments. Leaf spot control in reduced fungicide regimes in strip-till was comparable to leaf spot control in the standard 14-day fungicide regimes. Thus, strip-tillage may reduce fungicide requirements for leaf spot control on Georgia Green, and should allow for even better leaf spot control when combined with resistant cultivars such as Florida MDR-98 or C-99R. Utilization of precision agriculture technologies aided in visualizing and explaining some of treatment differences for leaf spot, stem rot, tomato spotted wilt, and yield in 2000 and 2001. Accepted for publication 23 February 2007. Published 14 June 2007.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Georgia Green leaf spot ratings in conventional tillage were 2.3 and 4.4 under treatments 1 and 2.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Material
- Georgia Greene0
- Interactor
- Cercospora arachidicolaMycosphaerella arachidise1pathogen
- Outcome
- Leaf spot ratingse0
- Value
- 2.3 and 4.4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf spot ratings were 2.3 and 4.4 for Georgia Green”
e1“early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola) of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Florida MDR-98 ratings were 1.9 and 3.3 under conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Material
- Florida MDR-98e0
- Interactor
- Cercospora arachidicolaMycosphaerella arachidise1pathogen
- Outcome
- leaf spote1
- Value
- 1.9 and 3.3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“1.9 and 3.3 for Florida MDR-98”
e1“early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola) of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
t0“Peanut”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip tillage with reduced fungicide gave leaf spot control comparable to the standard regime.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- reduced fungicide regimes in strip-tille0
- Interactor
- Cercospora arachidicolaMycosphaerella arachidise1pathogen
- Outcome
- Leaf spot controle0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- standard 14-day fungicide regimese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf spot control in reduced fungicide regimes in strip-till was comparable to leaf spot control in the standard 14-day fungicide regimes”
e1“early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola) of peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
t0“Peanut”
The same questions in other papers
fungicide · Mycosphaerella arachidis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.