Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales

RM Trethowan; NL Darvey

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rapid generation turnover techniques were used to identify parental, single cross or backcross populations with yield potential in triticale. Both complete (complete rye genome) and substituted (2D/2R substitution) triticale karyotypes were crossed. Temperature and light controlled greenhouses, immature seed germination, embryo culture and off season nurseries were used to advance three generations in 11 months. Due to seed limitations in the early generations, hill-plots were used to measure total dry matter, grain yield and harvest index. Mid-parent, F2 and F3 hill-plot yield was equivalent to or better than dry matter and harvest index for the prediction of F4 hill-plot yield. Both hill-plot yield (r = 0.54) and dry matter (r = 0-51) were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with large plot grain yield at the same site in the same year. The best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill-plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively. The F1 (r = -0.02¦0.12) provided no association with F4 hill-plot yield, reflecting the high average heterosis for yield (22%) observed in this material. Mid-parent, F2, F3 and F4 dry matter and yield means were significantly lower in inter-karyotypic crosses than intra-karyotypic crosses; however, the relationship between generations appeared to be independent of karyotype. A response to visual selection of individual spikes from hill-plots was obtained at two sites for dry matter and grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-parent, F2 and F3 hill-plot yield predicted F4 hill-plot yield at least as well as dry matter and harvest index.

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
prediction of F4 hill-plot yielde0
Direction
equivalent to or better thane0
Comparator
dry matter and harvest indexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mid-parent, F2 and F3 hill-plot yield was equivalent to or better than dry matter and harvest index for the prediction of F4 hill-plot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–687 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The F1 generation showed no association with F4 hill-plot yield (r = -0.02).

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
association with F4 hill-plot yielde1
Value
-0.02¦0.12e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The F1 (r = -0.02¦0.12) provided no association with F4 hill-plot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average heterosis for yield in this triticale material was 22%.

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
average heterosis for yielde2
Value
22%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“the high average heterosis for yield (22%) observed in this material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1178 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hill-plot yield correlated with large-plot grain yield at the same site in the same year (r = 0.54).

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
hill-plot yielde3
Outcome
large plot grain yielde3
Value
r = 0.54e3
Setting
at the same site in the same yeare3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both hill-plot yield (r = 0.54) and dry matter (r = 0-51) were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with large plot grain yield at the same site in the same year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–849 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter correlated with large-plot grain yield at the same site in the same year (r = 0.51).

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
dry mattere3
Outcome
large plot grain yielde3
Value
r = 0-51e3
Setting
at the same site in the same yeare3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both hill-plot yield (r = 0.54) and dry matter (r = 0-51) were significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with large plot grain yield at the same site in the same year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–849 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid-parent hill-plot yield was a best predictor of F4 hill-plot yield (phenotypic correlation 0.26).

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
best predictors of F4 hill-plot yielde4
Value
0- 26¦ 0.17e4
Qualifier
mid-parente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“The best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill-plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1024 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F2 hill-plot yield was a best predictor of F4 hill-plot yield (phenotypic correlation 0.35).

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
best predictors of F4 hill-plot yielde4
Value
0.3510 -03e4
Qualifier
F2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“The best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill-plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1024 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F3 hill-plot yield was a best predictor of F4 hill-plot yield (phenotypic correlation 0.44).

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
best predictors of F4 hill-plot yielde4
Value
0.44¦ 0.06e4
Qualifier
F3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“The best predictors of F4 hill-plot yield were mid-parent, F2 and F3 mean hill-plot yield with phenotypic correlations of 0- 26¦ 0.17, 0.3510 -03 and 0.44¦ 0.06 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter and yield means were lower in inter-karyotypic crosses than in intra-karyotypic crosses.

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
inter-karyotypic crossese5
Outcome
dry matter and yield meanse5
Direction
lowere5
Comparator
intra-karyotypic crossese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“Mid-parent, F2, F3 and F4 dry matter and yield means were significantly lower in inter-karyotypic crosses than intra-karyotypic crosses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1315 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The relationship between generations appeared to be independent of karyotype.

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
karyotypee6
Outcome
relationship between generationse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“the relationship between generations appeared to be independent of karyotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Visual selection of individual spikes from hill-plots gave a response for dry matter and grain yield at two sites.

Taxon
triticales×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
visual selection of individual spikes from hill-plotse7
Outcome
dry matter and grain yielde7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The predictive value of parental, F1 and early generation hill-plot testing for yield among rapidly advanced hexaploid triticales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e7

“A response to visual selection of individual spikes from hill-plots was obtained at two sites for dry matter and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1528 · show in text ↑