Paper · 2012 · Experimental and Applied Acarology

Interactions between the predatory mite Typhlodromalus aripo and the entomopathogenic fungus Neozygites tanajoae and consequences for the suppression of their shared prey/host Mononychellus tanajoa

Bonaventure Vidjannagni Agboton; Rachid Hanna; Alexis Onzo; et al.

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The predatory mite Typhlodromalus aripo and the entomopathogenic fungus Neozygites tanajoae, both introduced from Brazil for control of the cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa, now co-occur in cassava fields in Benin. However, studies on interactions between these two natural enemies and how they might affect CGM biological control are lacking. We determined in screenhouse experiments the effects of single and combined releases of N. tanajoae and T. aripo on CGM suppression. In the single natural enemy treatment, both T. aripo and N. tanajoae significantly reduced CGM densities, but the results of the predator (T. aripo) are more quickly measurable than those of the pathogen (N. tanajoae) in our short-term experiment. The level of CGM suppression in the combined natural enemy treatment was reduced considerably compared with T. aripo-alone, but only slightly when compared with N. tanajoae alone, with a simultaneous reduction in T. aripo and N. tanajoae abundance or prevalence. In a laboratory experiment, T. aripo fed more on N. tanajoae-infected CGM than on healthy CGM and its oviposition and survival were reduced when fed on the former compared with the latter, which can help in explaining the reduction in numbers of T. aripo and consequently the considerable loss in suppression of CGM in the combined natural enemy treatment in the screenhouse experiment. Together, the screenhouse and the laboratory experiments predicted negative interactions between the two natural enemies with negative consequences for CGM biological control. Long-term field observations and rigorous field experiments that simultaneously manipulate T. aripo and N. tanajoae abundance and prevalence are needed to validate the prediction of this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. aripo alone significantly reduced cassava green mite density.

Treatment
T. aripoe1
Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae2pest
Second interactor
T. aripoTyphlodromalus aripoe1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
CGM densitiese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both T. aripo and N. tanajoae significantly reduced CGM densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“single and combined releases of N. tanajoae and T. aripo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–470 · show in text ↑
e2

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N. tanajoae alone significantly reduced cassava green mite density.

Treatment
N. tanajoaee1
Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae2pest
Second interactor
N. tanajoaeNeozygites tanajoaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
CGM densitiese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both T. aripo and N. tanajoae significantly reduced CGM densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–595 · show in text ↑
e1

“single and combined releases of N. tanajoae and T. aripo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–470 · show in text ↑
e2

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The predator effect was measurable sooner than the pathogen effect.

Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae1pest
Outcome
more quickly measurablee0
Comparator
N. tanajoaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results of the predator (T. aripo) are more quickly measurable than those of the pathogen (N. tanajoae) in our short-term experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined release suppressed cassava green mite considerably less than T. aripo alone.

Treatment
combined natural enemy treatmente0
Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae1pest
Outcome
CGM suppressione0
Direction
reduced considerablye0
Comparator
T. aripo-alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level of CGM suppression in the combined natural enemy treatment was reduced considerably compared with T. aripo-alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined release suppressed cassava green mite slightly less than N. tanajoae alone.

Treatment
combined natural enemy treatmente0
Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae1pest
Outcome
CGM suppressione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
N. tanajoae alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level of CGM suppression in the combined natural enemy treatment was reduced considerably compared with T. aripo-alone, but only slightly when compared with N. tanajoae alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced T. aripo abundance.

Treatment
combined natural enemy treatmente1
Interactor
T. aripoTyphlodromalus aripoe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
abundance or prevalencee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a simultaneous reduction in T. aripo and N. tanajoae abundance or prevalence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1000 · show in text ↑
e1

“CGM suppression in the combined natural enemy treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–807 · show in text ↑
e2

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced N. tanajoae abundance or prevalence.

Treatment
combined natural enemy treatmente1
Interactor
N. tanajoaeNeozygites tanajoaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
N. tanajoae abundance or prevalencee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a simultaneous reduction in T. aripo and N. tanajoae abundance or prevalence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1000 · show in text ↑
e1

“CGM suppression in the combined natural enemy treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–807 · show in text ↑
e2

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. aripo fed more on infected than healthy cassava green mites.

Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae1pest
Second interactor
T. aripoTyphlodromalus aripoe0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. aripo fede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
healthy CGMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. aripo fed more on N. tanajoae-infected CGM than on healthy CGM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. aripo oviposition decreased when it fed on infected rather than healthy mites.

Treatment
N. tanajoae-infected CGMe1
Interactor
T. aripoTyphlodromalus aripoe1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ovipositione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
healthy CGMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its oviposition and survival were reduced when fed on the former compared with the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“T. aripo fed more on N. tanajoae-infected CGM than on healthy CGM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1095 · show in text ↑
e2

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. aripo survival decreased when it fed on infected rather than healthy mites.

Treatment
N. tanajoae-infected CGMe1
Interactor
T. aripoTyphlodromalus aripoe1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
healthy CGMe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its oviposition and survival were reduced when fed on the former compared with the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“T. aripo fed more on N. tanajoae-infected CGM than on healthy CGM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1095 · show in text ↑
e2

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that negative interactions between the two enemies harm mite biological control.

Interactor
Mononychellus tanajoaMononychellus tanajoae1pest
Second interactor
N. tanajoaeNeozygites tanajoaee2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
CGM biological controle0
Qualifier
negative interactions between the two natural enemiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative interactions between the two natural enemies with negative consequences for CGM biological control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1563 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑
e2

“N. tanajoae and T. aripo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–470 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend long-term field observations and manipulative experiments to validate the prediction.

Outcome
Long-term field observations and rigorous field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term field observations and rigorous field experiments that simultaneously manipulate T. aripo and N. tanajoae abundance and prevalence are needed to validate the prediction of this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1758 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava green mite (CGM) Mononychellus tanajoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–186 · show in text ↑

Typhlodromalus aripo · Mononychellus tanajoa · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Neozygites tanajoae · Mononychellus tanajoa · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.