Paper · 1991 · Agronomie

Comparison of traps for capture of alate aphids (Homoptera, Aphidinea) in apricot tree orchards

L. Avinent; A. Hermoso de Mendoza; G. Llácer

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
21
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

— Three types of trap, yellow water trap (Moericke), green water trap and sticky fishing-line trap (placed at 2 orientations and at 2 heights) were used to sample alate aphid populations in 2 apricot tree orchards infected with sharka (plum pox) virus. These traps were operated in the spring of 1988 and 1989 at 2 locations in Valencia (Spain); 149 086 aphids were caught. Aphis gossypii was the most important species in our orchards since it was the most abundant in fishing-line traps. In these traps height had an influence in species composition, while orientation did not. Yellow colour attraction was very clear for Aphis spiraecola while colour attraction was not clear for A gossypii. Very different results were obtained with the 3 types of trap. The percentage of A spiraecola in yellow traps was much higher than that in the green traps and the percentage in green traps was much higher than that in the fishing-line traps. The percentage of A gossypii in fishing-line traps was much higher than that in the green traps and the percentage in green traps was higher than that in the yellow traps. aphid / yellow trap / green trap / fishing-line trap / sharka Rsum — Comparaison de piges pour l'chantillonnage des pucerons ails (Homoptera, Aphidinea) dans deux vergers d'abricotiers. Trois modles de piges, pige jaune eau (Moericke), pige vert eau et pige fils englus (2 orientations et 2 hauteurs) ont t essays pour chantillonner les populations de pucerons ails dans 2 vergers d'abricotiers infects par le virus de la sharka (plum pox virus). Ces piges ont t mis en place aux prin- temps 1988 et 1989, dans 2 localits de Valencia (Espagne) (tableau I). 149 086 pucerons ont t capturs. L'espce la plus importante a t Aphis gossypii puisqu'elle a t la plus abondante sur les piges fils englus. Sur ces piges la hauteur a eu une influence sur la composition des espces, mais non l'orientation (tableaux II, III). L'attraction de la couleur jaune a t trs marque pour Aphis spiraecola (tableau IV) tandis que cette attraction n'a pas t claire pour A gossypii. On a obtenu des rsultats trs diffrents selon le pige utilis (tableau V, fig Le pourcentage de A spiraecola sur le pige jaune a t beaucoup plus lev que sur le pige vert et le pourcentage sur le pige vert plus lev que sur le pige fils. Le pourcentage de A gossypii sur le pige fils a t beaucoup plus lev que sur le pige vert et le pourcentage sur le pige vert a t plus lev que sur le pige jaune.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The traps caught 149 086 aphids.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
aphids were caughte0
Value
149 086e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“149 086 aphids were caught”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–372 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphis gossypii was most abundant in fishing-line traps.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
most abundant in fishing-line trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphis gossypii was the most important species in our orchards since it was the most abundant in fishing-line traps.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fishing-line trap height influenced aphid species composition.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
heighte0
Outcome
species compositione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In these traps height had an influence in species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fishing-line trap orientation did not influence aphid species composition.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
orientatione0
Outcome
orientation did note0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while orientation did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphis spiraecola showed clear attraction to yellow.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
Aphis spiraecolaAphis spiraecolae0pest
Outcome
Yellow colour attractione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis spiraecola
Aphis spiraecola · InteractorMarco de Haas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow colour attraction was very clear for Aphis spiraecola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow attraction was unclear for A. gossypii.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
A gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
colour attraction was not cleare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“colour attraction was not clear for A gossypii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. spiraecola proportions ranked yellow above green above fishing-line traps.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
A spiraecolaAphis spiraecolae0pest
Outcome
percentage of A spiraecolae0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
green trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis spiraecola
Aphis spiraecola · InteractorMarco de Haas · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of A spiraecola in yellow traps was much higher than that in the green traps and the percentage in green traps was much higher than that in the fishing-line traps.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. gossypii proportions ranked fishing-line above green above yellow traps.

Taxon
apricot treePrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
A gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
percentage of A gossypiie0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
green trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of A gossypii in fishing-line traps was much higher than that in the green traps and the percentage in green traps was higher than that in the yellow traps.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot tree orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–95 · show in text ↑