Paper · 2014 · Environmental Entomology

Seasonal Phenology ofAmphorophora agathonica(Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Spread of Viruses in Red Raspberry in Washington

D. M. Lightle; D. Quito-Avila; R. R. Martin; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Amphorophora agathonica (Hottes) is the primary vector of aphid-transmitted viruses in red raspberry in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. To better understand the biology of the aphid, we estimated the lower developmental threshold and studied the seasonal activity of A. agathonica in commercial fields in northern Washington state. In addition, we monitored the spread of raspberry viruses (raspberry latent virus and raspberry leaf mottle virus, RLMV) to determine how rapidly fields became infected and whether there was a relationship between aphid presence and infection. The lower developmental threshold of A. agathonica was estimated to be 2.7°C. In the field, apterous and alate aphid populations began rapidly increasing at ≍800 growing degree-days and peaked at 1,050 growing degree-days. RLMV spread rapidly, with 30-60% of plants in four different commercial fields testing positive after three growing seasons. There was no discernible relationship between the presence or abundance of aphids based on 10 leaves sampled per plant location, and the odds of that plant becoming infected with RLMV.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lower developmental threshold of A. agathonica was estimated at 2.7°C.

Taxon
A. agathonicaAmphorophora agathonicae0
Outcome
lower developmental thresholde0
Value
2.7°Ce0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · TaxonU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower developmental threshold of A. agathonica was estimated to be 2.7°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–672 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field aphid populations began rapidly increasing around 800 growing degree-days.

Taxon
A. agathonicaAmphorophora agathonicae1
Outcome
apterous and alate aphid populationse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
≍800 growing degree-dayse0
Setting
northern Washington statee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · TaxonU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, apterous and alate aphid populations began rapidly increasing at ≍800 growing degree-days and peaked at 1,050 growing degree-days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied the seasonal activity of A. agathonica in commercial fields in northern Washington state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–349 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field aphid populations peaked at 1,050 growing degree-days.

Taxon
A. agathonicaAmphorophora agathonicae1
Outcome
apterous and alate aphid populationse0
Direction
peakede0
Value
1,050 growing degree-dayse0
Setting
northern Washington statee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amphorophora agathonica
Amphorophora agathonica · TaxonU.S. Department of Agriculture · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, apterous and alate aphid populations began rapidly increasing at ≍800 growing degree-days and peaked at 1,050 growing degree-days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“studied the seasonal activity of A. agathonica in commercial fields in northern Washington state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–349 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After three growing seasons, 30-60% of raspberry plants in four commercial fields tested positive for RLMV.

Taxon
Red RaspberryRubus idaeust0
Interactor
raspberry leaf mottle virusRaspberry leaf mottle viruse1pathogen
Outcome
testing positivee0
Value
30-60%e0
Qualifier
after three growing seasonse0
Setting
commercial fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RLMV spread rapidly, with 30-60% of plants in four different commercial fields testing positive after three growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–942 · show in text ↑
e1

“raspberry leaf mottle virus, RLMV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid presence or abundance had no discernible relationship with the odds of raspberry infection by RLMV under the leaf sampling scheme.

Taxon
Red RaspberryRubus idaeust0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Second interactor
RLMVRaspberry leaf mottle viruse0pathogen
Outcome
odds of that plant becoming infected with RLMVe0
Direction
no discernible relationshipe0
Qualifier
based on 10 leaves sampled per plant locatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no discernible relationship between the presence or abundance of aphids based on 10 leaves sampled per plant location, and the odds of that plant becoming infected with RLMV.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–105 · show in text ↑