Paper · 1973 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

The interaction of wheat genotypes with a specific factor of the environment

H. S. Easton; R. J. Clements

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Several alternative statistical approaches to the analysis of genotype-environment interactions are summarized, and their inter-relationships are presented mathematically and graphically. An experiment was designed to test the ability of these analyses to satisfactorily describe genotype-environment interactions and to locate genotypes causing or contributing significantly to such interactions in a situation where environments differed in only one factor, i.e. soil nitrogen status. Twenty-five lines of wheat were grown at each of 5 levels of applied nitrogen (0–270 kg N/ha) in a sandy, nitrogen-deficient soil, and their grain yields and yield components (ears per unit area, grains per ear, weight per grain) were determined. Designating the nitrogen levels as ‘environments’, linear yield responses, and deviations from linear responses, of individual wheat entries to environment mean yield were calculated according to the various statistical procedures previously outlined. The results suggested that the linear response to environment mean yield was similar for all wheat entries. However, further inspection of the data revealed that the responses of eight entries to environment mean yield departed significantly from linearity. Although several analyses satisfactorily identified these aberrant entries, classifying them as ‘unstable’, it was concluded that the degree of departure from linearity of response was not an adequate measure of instability. Furthermore, as previously suggested by Knight (1970), it was confirmed that the relative ranking of an entry for yield stability according to such a concept varied according to the average response of the group of entries with which it was being compared. The general effects of applied nitrogen on yield components were to increase the number of ears and the number of grains per ear, and to decrease grain weight. However, only the first of these effects occurred consistently for all entries. The number and weight of individual grains per ear varied with the nitrogen treatment, often unpredictably, in a complex pattern which differed significantly between entries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linear yield response to environment mean yield was similar across wheat entries.

Outcome
linear response to environment mean yielde0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the linear response to environment mean yield was similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight wheat entries showed significant departure from linear response to environment mean yield.

Outcome
responses of eight entries to environment mean yield departed significantly from linearitye0
Value
eight entriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“responses of eight entries to environment mean yield departed significantly from linearity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1250 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several analyses identified the aberrant wheat entries as unstable.

Outcome
identified these aberrant entriese0
Comparator
‘unstable’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several analyses satisfactorily identified these aberrant entries, classifying them as ‘unstable’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Departure from linearity was judged inadequate for measuring wheat yield instability.

Outcome
measure of instabilitye0
Comparator
degree of departure from linearity of responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the degree of departure from linearity of response was not an adequate measure of instability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A wheat entry’s yield stability ranking varied with the average response of the comparison group.

Outcome
relative ranking of an entry for yield stabilitye0
Comparator
average response of the group of entriese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative ranking of an entry for yield stability according to such a concept varied according to the average response of the group of entries with which it was being compared”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen generally increased wheat grains per ear.

Treatment
applied nitrogene0
Outcome
number of grains per eare0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The general effects of applied nitrogen on yield components were to increase the number of ears and the number of grains per ear, and to decrease grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1893 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen generally decreased wheat grain weight.

Treatment
applied nitrogene0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The general effects of applied nitrogen on yield components were to increase the number of ears and the number of grains per ear, and to decrease grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1893 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number per ear varied unpredictably with nitrogen treatment and differed significantly among wheat entries.

Treatment
nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
number and weight of individual grains per eare0
Qualifier
often unpredictablye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number and weight of individual grains per ear varied with the nitrogen treatment, often unpredictably, in a complex pattern which differed significantly between entries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2148 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight varied unpredictably with nitrogen treatment and differed significantly among wheat entries.

Treatment
nitrogen treatmente0
Outcome
weight of individual grains per eare0
Qualifier
often unpredictablye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number and weight of individual grains per ear varied with the nitrogen treatment, often unpredictably, in a complex pattern which differed significantly between entries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1974–2148 · show in text ↑
e1

“similar for all wheat entries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1100 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.