Paper · 1962 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR ISOLATING RHIZOCTONIA FROM SOIL

C. B. Davey; G. C. Papavizas

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four methods described in the literature for isolating Rhizoctonia spp. from soil were employed simultaneously with two naturally infested soils. Each method had certain distinct advantages and characteristics which would suggest its use under particular circumstances. The infected host method was best for studies on the range of clones of the fungus pathogenic to certain plants. The immersion tube method recovered a limited number of clones of the fungus. The debris particle method in conjunction with the buckwheat colonization method gave the most complete information since the debris particle method reflected the status of the quiescent rhizoctonia in soil and the buckwheat colonization method, the active. Clones of the fungus obtained by the four methods varied from non-pathogenic to strongly pathogenic on live species of plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The infected host method was best for studying fungal clones pathogenic to plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
range of clones of the fungus pathogenic to certain plantse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The infected host method was best for studies on the range of clones of the fungus pathogenic to certain plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–382 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The immersion tube method recovered a limited number of fungal clones.

Outcome
number of clones of the funguse0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The immersion tube method recovered a limited number of clones of the fungus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–460 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The debris particle and buckwheat colonization methods together gave the most complete information on soil Rhizoctonia.

Outcome
informatione0
Direction
most completee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The debris particle method in conjunction with the buckwheat colonization method gave the most complete information”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolated Rhizoctonia clones ranged from non-pathogenic to strongly pathogenic on plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
funguse0pathogen
Outcome
pathogenice0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Clones of the fungus obtained by the four methods varied from non-pathogenic to strongly pathogenic on live species of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–845 · show in text ↑