Abstract
The causal agent of leaf and pods spot-pot of peas and field peas in the Olsztyn district was the fungus Ascochyta pinodes (Jones). Investigated isolates of A. pinoides different by macroscopic and microscopic features. From diseased leaves and pods of peas and field peas saprophytic fungi were also obtained. Among them Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Epicoccum purpurascens, Stemphylium botryosum, Sordaria fimicola and mycelia sterilia were dominant. In the study on the identification and distribution of pathotypes of A. pinodes (Jones) six pathotypes were identified among which pathotypes 3 dominated. The identified pathotypes differed by macroscopic and microscopic features.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Ascochyta pinodes was identified as the causal agent of pea and field pea leaf and pod spot in Olsztyn.
- Taxon
- peas and field pease0
- Interactor
- Ascochyta pinodes
Didymella pinodese0pathogen - Outcome
- leaf and pods spot-pote0
- Setting
- Olsztyn districte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The causal agent of leaf and pods spot-pot of peas and field peas in the Olsztyn district was the fungus Ascochyta pinodes (Jones)”
Claim · model-written summary
Investigated A. pinoides isolates differed in macroscopic and microscopic features.
- Interactor
- A. pinoidese0pathogen
- Outcome
- A. pinoides different by macroscopic and microscopic featurese0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Investigated isolates of A. pinoides different by macroscopic and microscopic features”
Claim · model-written summary
Saprophytic fungi were recovered from diseased pea and field pea leaves and pods.
Verbatim
e0“From diseased leaves and pods of peas and field peas saprophytic fungi were also obtained”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, and Epicoccum purpurascens were dominant among recovered fungi.
- Interactor
- Alternaria alternata
.jpg?width=60)
Alternaria alternatae0other - Outcome
- were dominante0
- Qualifier
- Cladosporium cladosporioides, Epicoccum purpurascense0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Among them Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Epicoccum purpurascens, Stemphylium botryosum, Sordaria fimicola and mycelia sterilia were dominant”
Claim · model-written summary
Stemphylium botryosum, Sordaria fimicola, and mycelia sterilia were dominant among recovered fungi.
- Interactor
- Stemphylium botryosum
Stemphylium botryosume0other - Outcome
- were dominante0
- Qualifier
- Sordaria fimicola and mycelia steriliae0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among them Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Epicoccum purpurascens, Stemphylium botryosum, Sordaria fimicola and mycelia sterilia were dominant”
Claim · model-written summary
Six A. pinodes pathotypes were identified.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“six pathotypes were identified among which pathotypes 3 dominated”
Claim · model-written summary
Pathotype 3 dominated among the identified A. pinodes pathotypes.
- Outcome
- pathotypes 3 dominatede0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“six pathotypes were identified among which pathotypes 3 dominated”
Claim · model-written summary
Identified pathotypes differed in macroscopic and microscopic features.
- Outcome
- pathotypes differed by macroscopic and microscopic featurese0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The identified pathotypes differed by macroscopic and microscopic features”