Paper · 1979 · Australian Journal of Botany

Trends in Vegetation at Kosciusko. 1. Grazing Trials in the Subalpine Zone, 1957-1971

DJ Wimbush; AB Costin

16
claims
27
verbatim quotes
51
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper examines vegetation changes in the absence of fires at Kosciusko during the 14 years following the general withdrawal of livestock grazing at Kosciusko in 1958 on two pairs of plots on subalpine grassland at Dainers Gap (elev. 1700 m) and in the Hotel Kosciusko Water Reserve (elev. 1660 m). One plot in each pair was experimentally grazed. and the other plot was ungrazed. The vegetation of the Kosciusko Reserve was in a relatively natural condition, characterized by continuous forb-rich snowgrass associated with regenerating snowgum woodland. At Dainers Gap the snowgrass was less continuous, and there was no snowgum regeneration. In the Kosciusko Reserve the main effect of grazing was to reduce the cover of the large palatable forbs. This change appeared to be largely reversible within 6 years after the 8 years of grazing treatment was discontinued. At Dainers Gap the tussocks spread laterally in the absence of fire. on both the grazed and ungrazed plots. Under grazing (5 sheepjha/season), small grazing-adapted herbs maintained themselves on the intertussock spaces, but in the absence of grazing they were largely replaced by taller-growing species, many of which appeared only after this treatment had ceased. Shrubs, although uncommon, increased rapidly in size, especially on the grazed plot where competition from herbaceous species was reduced. On the grazed plot the area of bare soil did not decrease appreciably but on the ungrazed plot it decreased on all but the largest bare patches where the lateral spread of tussocks and shrubs was not sufficient to cover them. Under grazing the standing crop on the intertussock spaces at Dainers Gap remained at low levels of about 0.3 kg/m2. but when not grazed for 10 years it increased to about 1 kg/m2, with a resultant increase in surface soil organic matter and decrease in bulk density. During the one season when sheep were weighed at monthly intervals. they gained weight at both sites at the start of the grazing season until the supply of the relatively palatable and nutritious herbs and grass inflorescences was exhausted, then lost weight as mature snowgrass leaves became the main part of their diet. Seasonal weight losses of sheep increased over the 15 years of the experiment as most of the major forbs were eliminated by grazing from the Kosciusko Water Reserve plot, and the area of minor herbs was reduced at Dainers Gap by the encroachment of snowgrass tussocks onto the intertussock spaces. At Dainers Gap in the absence of grazing and fires; water catchment and nature conservation values improved but. without fire, unpalatable snowgrasses and shrubs increased and the value of the area for grazing was reduced. With grazing, the previously unsatisfactory conditions for water catchment and nature conservation were maintained. At the Kosciusko Water Reserve nature conservation and grazing values were reduced by grazing. Introduction Transhumant grazing increasingly became a major issue in the use and management of the Snowy Mountains, following completion of the Hume Dam in the early 1920s and the report by Byles (1932) documenting the deterioration of parts of the Hume

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Kosciusko Reserve had continuous forb-rich snowgrass and regenerating snowgum woodland.

Taxon
snowgrasse0
Outcome
continuous forb-rich snowgrasse0
Setting
Kosciusko Reservee1

Verbatim

e0

“continuous forb-rich snowgrass associated with regenerating snowgum woodland”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–557 · show in text ↑
e1

“The vegetation of the Kosciusko Reserve was in a relatively natural condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–462 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dainers Gap had less continuous snowgrass and no snowgum regeneration.

Taxon
snowgrasse0
Outcome
snowgrasse0
Direction
less continuouse0
Setting
Dainers Gape0

Verbatim

e0

“At Dainers Gap the snowgrass was less continuous, and there was no snowgum regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing reduced cover of large palatable forbs in the Kosciusko Reserve.

Taxon
large palatable forbse0
Treatment
grazinge0
Outcome
covere0
Direction
reducee0
Setting
Kosciusko Reservee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the Kosciusko Reserve the main effect of grazing was to reduce the cover of the large palatable forbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forb cover recovered substantially within six years after grazing stopped.

Taxon
large palatable forbse1
Outcome
largely reversiblee0
Value
6 yearse0

Verbatim

e0

“This change appeared to be largely reversible within 6 years after the 8 years of grazing treatment was discontinued”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“the large palatable forbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tussocks spread laterally in both grazed and ungrazed plots without fire.

Taxon
tussockse0
Outcome
spread laterallye0
Setting
Dainers Gape0

Verbatim

e0

“At Dainers Gap the tussocks spread laterally in the absence of fire. on both the grazed and ungrazed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small grazing-adapted herbs persisted under grazing.

Taxon
small grazing-adapted herbse0
Treatment
grazing (5 sheepjha/season)e0
Outcome
maintained themselves on the intertussock spacese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Under grazing (5 sheepjha/season), small grazing-adapted herbs maintained themselves on the intertussock spaces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without grazing, taller-growing species largely replaced small herbs.

Taxon
taller-growing speciese0
Treatment
absence of grazinge0
Outcome
replaced by taller-growing speciese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“in the absence of grazing they were largely replaced by taller-growing species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrubs increased rapidly in size, especially on the grazed plot.

Taxon
Shrubse0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
grazed plote0

Verbatim

e0

“Shrubs, although uncommon, increased rapidly in size, especially on the grazed plot where competition from herbaceous species was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1375 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare soil did not appreciably decline on the grazed plot.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Outcome
area of bare soile0
Direction
did not decrease appreciablye0

Verbatim

e0

“On the grazed plot the area of bare soil did not decrease appreciably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare soil decreased on the ungrazed plot except the largest patches.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Outcome
bare soilt1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
all but the largest bare patchese0

Verbatim

e0

“on the ungrazed plot it decreased on all but the largest bare patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
t1

“bare soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1417 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intertussock standing crop remained about 0.3 kg/m2 under grazing.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Outcome
standing crope0
Value
0.3 kg/m2e0
Setting
Dainers Gape0

Verbatim

e0

“Under grazing the standing crop on the intertussock spaces at Dainers Gap remained at low levels of about 0.3 kg/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After ten ungrazed years, intertussock standing crop reached about 1 kg/m2.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Outcome
standing cropt1
Direction
increasede0
Value
1 kg/m2e0

Verbatim

e0

“when not grazed for 10 years it increased to about 1 kg/m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
t1

“standing crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrazed vegetation increased surface soil organic matter.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Outcome
surface soil organic mattere0
Direction
increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“with a resultant increase in surface soil organic matter and decrease in bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrazed vegetation decreased soil bulk density.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“with a resultant increase in surface soil organic matter and decrease in bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without grazing and fire, snowgrasses and shrubs increased and grazing value fell at Dainers Gap.

Taxon
snowgrasses and shrubse0
Outcome
increasede0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“without fire, unpalatable snowgrasses and shrubs increased and the value of the area for grazing was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2604–2712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing reduced conservation and grazing values at the Kosciusko Water Reserve.

Taxon
Vegetationt0
Treatment
grazinge0
Outcome
nature conservation and grazing valuese0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Kosciusko Water Reservee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At the Kosciusko Water Reserve nature conservation and grazing values were reduced by grazing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2830–2923 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑