Paper · 1955 · Journal of General Microbiology

Studies on the Ability of Light to Counteract the Inactivating Action of Ultraviolet Radiation on Plant Viruses

F. C. BAWDEN; A. KLECZKOWSKI

13
claims
14
verbatim quotes
68
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary: Of seven plant viruses tested, all except tobacco mosaic showed the phenomenon of photoreactivation, i.e. plants exposed to visible light after inoculation with preparations partially inactivated by ultraviolet radiation produced more local lesions than plants kept in darkness. Five strains of tobacco mosaic virus, which differed widely in their pathogenicity and other properties, were tested, but none showed the phenomenon. Of the six viruses that did, potato showed it much the most strongly, tomato bushy stunt and a tobacco necrosis virus the least; cabbage black ringspot, cucumber mosaic and tobacco ringspot were intermediate. Photoreactivation does not occur immediately after plants are inoculated. With irradiated preparations of potato virus X, most particles need about 30 min. to reach the state in which their ability to infect is affected by light; once in this state, exposure to daylight for 15 min. gives almost complete photoreactivation. Some irradiated particles respond to light of 80 f.c., but others need brighter light; no additional response occurs when light intensity is increased above 600 f.c. The sensitive state of potato virus X persists for about 1 hr. in plants kept in darkness, after which the particles seem to be permanently inactivated. With antibodies and enzymes, a constant amount of absorbed energy decreases the activity of a unit weight by a given fraction. This rule does not apply to plant viruses, which lose infectivity with less absorbed energy than the rule predicts. If viruses are more sensitive because they contain nucleic acid, their sensitivity is not a direct function of their content of nucleic acid. Potato virus X has the same nucleic acid content as strains of tobacco mosaic virus, but is inactivated by less absorbed energy and individual strains of tobacco mosaic virus also differ by factors of two in the amount of radiation needed to decrease their infectivity by a given fraction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For six of seven plant viruses tested (all except tobacco mosaic), plants exposed to visible light after inoculation with UV-partially-inactivated preparations produced more local lesions than plants kept in darkness (photoreactivation).

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
visible light after inoculation with preparations partially inactivated by ultraviolet radiatione0
Interactor
plant virusese0pathogen
Outcome
local lesionse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
plants kept in darknesse0

Verbatim

e0

“Of seven plant viruses tested, all except tobacco mosaic showed the phenomenon of photoreactivation, i.e. plants exposed to visible light after inoculation with preparations partially inactivated by ultraviolet radiation produced more local lesions than plants kept in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–286 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five strains of tobacco mosaic virus, differing widely in pathogenicity and other properties, none showed photoreactivation.

Interactor
tobacco mosaic virusTobacco mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
none showed the phenomenone0

Not reportedTaxon

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tobacco mosaic virus
Tobacco mosaic virus · InteractorFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Five strains of tobacco mosaic virus, which differed widely in their pathogenicity and other properties, were tested, but none showed the phenomenon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among the six viruses showing photoreactivation, potato virus showed it most strongly, tomato bushy stunt and a tobacco necrosis virus the least, and cabbage black ringspot, cucumber mosaic and tobacco ringspot were intermediate.

Outcome
showed it much the most stronglye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Of the six viruses that did, potato showed it much the most strongly, tomato bushy stunt and a tobacco necrosis virus the least; cabbage black ringspot, cucumber mosaic and tobacco ringspot were intermediate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–645 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoreactivation does not occur immediately after plants are inoculated.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
Photoreactivation does not occur immediatelye0

Verbatim

e0

“Photoreactivation does not occur immediately after plants are inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–719 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For irradiated potato virus X preparations, most particles need about 30 min to reach the state in which their infectivity is affected by light.

Taxon
potato virus XPotato virus Xe0
Interactor
potato virus XPotato virus Xe0pathogen
Outcome
most particles need about 30 min. to reach the statee0
Value
about 30 min.e0

Verbatim

e0

“With irradiated preparations of potato virus X, most particles need about 30 min. to reach the state in which their ability to infect is affected by light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Once in the light-sensitive state, exposure to daylight for 15 min gives almost complete photoreactivation of potato virus X.

Taxon
potato virus XPotato virus Xe1
Treatment
exposure to daylight for 15 min.e0
Outcome
photoreactivatione0
Direction
almost completee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“once in this state, exposure to daylight for 15 min. gives almost complete photoreactivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“With irradiated preparations of potato virus X, most particles need about 30 min. to reach the state in which their ability to infect is affected by light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–875 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some irradiated potato virus X particles respond to light of 80 f.c., while others need brighter light.

Outcome
respond to light of 80 f.c., but others need brighter lighte0
Value
80 f.c.e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Some irradiated particles respond to light of 80 f.c., but others need brighter light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1056 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No additional photoreactivation response occurs when light intensity is increased above 600 f.c.

Outcome
no additional responsee0
Value
600 f.c.e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“no additional response occurs when light intensity is increased above 600 f.c.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The light-sensitive state of potato virus X persists for about 1 hour in plants kept in darkness, after which particles appear permanently inactivated.

Taxon
potato virus XPotato virus Xe0
Outcome
The sensitive statee0
Value
about 1 hr.e0
Setting
plants kept in darknesse0

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitive state of potato virus X persists for about 1 hr. in plants kept in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant viruses lose infectivity with less absorbed energy than the antibody/enzyme rule predicts.

Taxon
plant virusese0
Outcome
lose infectivity with less absorbed energy than the rule predictse0

Verbatim

e0

“This rule does not apply to plant viruses, which lose infectivity with less absorbed energy than the rule predicts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1531 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus sensitivity to inactivation is not a direct function of nucleic acid content.

Taxon
virusesVirusese0
Compound
nucleic acide0
Outcome
their sensitivitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“If viruses are more sensitive because they contain nucleic acid, their sensitivity is not a direct function of their content of nucleic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato virus X has the same nucleic acid content as tobacco mosaic virus strains but is inactivated by less absorbed energy.

Taxon
Potato virus XPotato virus Xe0
Interactor
tobacco mosaic virusTobacco mosaic viruse0pathogen
Outcome
inactivated by less absorbed energye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tobacco mosaic virus
Tobacco mosaic virus · InteractorFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potato virus X has the same nucleic acid content as strains of tobacco mosaic virus, but is inactivated by less absorbed energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual tobacco mosaic virus strains differ by factors of two in the radiation needed to decrease infectivity by a given fraction.

Taxon
tobacco mosaic virusTobacco mosaic viruse0
Outcome
the amount of radiation needed to decrease their infectivitye0
Value
factors of twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tobacco mosaic virus
Tobacco mosaic virus · TaxonFrank Vincentz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual strains of tobacco mosaic virus also differ by factors of two in the amount of radiation needed to decrease their infectivity by a given fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1963 · show in text ↑