Paper · 1992 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Row cover and population density effects on yield of bell peppers in south coastal British Columbia

M. M. Gaye; P. A. Jolliffe; A. R. Maurer

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Row cover and plant population density effects were studied at the Agriculture Canada Research Station, Agassiz, BC in 1988 and 1989. Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid) were transplanted into twin rows (0.45 m apart) on raised beds (1.8-m centers) at five population densities of 1.39, 1.85, 2.78, 5.56 and 11.1 plant m −2 . For 7 wk in 1988 or 8 wk in 1989, subplots were either covered or not covered with slit clear polyethylene tunnels. A nonlinear regression model was used to define yield-population density responses. Row covers enhanced early and overall yields in 1988 and overall yield in 1989. Vegetative and reproductive yields (kg plant −1 ) declined with increasing plant population density. Yields were directly related to population density when measured on a land-area basis. Maximum fruit yield (7.9 kg m −2 ) was obtained at the highest population density. Treatment influences on fruit size were small and did not affect horticultural quality. An economic analysis showed that net returns were greatest with plants grown under row covers at the highest population density.Key words: Capsicum annuum L., field bell peppers, population density, row covers

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row covers enhanced early and overall yield in 1988 and overall yield in 1989.

Taxon
Bell peppere1
Material
Ace Hybride1
Treatment
Row coverse0
Outcome
early and overall yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Row covers enhanced early and overall yields in 1988 and overall yield in 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–600 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–165 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Per-plant vegetative and reproductive yields declined as plant density increased.

Taxon
Bell peppere1
Material
Ace Hybride1
Treatment
plant population densitye0
Outcome
Vegetative and reproductive yieldse0
Direction
declinede0

Verbatim

e0

“Vegetative and reproductive yields (kg plant −1 ) declined with increasing plant population density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–165 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield per land area increased with plant density.

Taxon
Bell peppere1
Material
Ace Hybride1
Treatment
population densitye0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Qualifier
land-area basise0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were directly related to population density when measured on a land-area basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–788 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum fruit yield was 7.9 kg m −2 at the highest density.

Taxon
Bell peppere1
Material
Ace Hybride1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
7.9 kg m −2e0
Qualifier
highest population densitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum fruit yield (7.9 kg m −2 ) was obtained at the highest population density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–871 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–165 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment effects on fruit size were small and did not affect horticultural quality.

Taxon
Bell peppere1
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
smalle0

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment influences on fruit size were small and did not affect horticultural quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns were greatest under row covers at highest density.

Taxon
Bell peppere1
Treatment
row coverse0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
highest population densitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“net returns were greatest with plants grown under row covers at the highest population density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1088 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bell pepper plants (Ace Hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–165 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.