Paper · 2006 · Phytopathology

Distribution and Pathogenic Characterization of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and Stagonospora nodorum in Ohio

Jessica S. Engle; Laurence V. Madden; Patrick E. Lipps

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT To determine the distribution of Stagonospora nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis on wheat in Ohio, flag leaves with lesions were collected from wheat-producing counties in 2002 and 2003. Counties were arbitrarily grouped into seven regions. Log-linear analysis of pathogen presence within regions indicated that the presence of S. nodorum was independent of the presence of P. tritici-repentis. A logistic analysis revealed that the occurrence of both pathogens varied by region in one or both years. The aggressiveness of S. nodorum isolates was determined by inoculating two susceptible genotypes with a subsample of isolates from each region from both years. S. nodorum isolates obtained from northeast Ohio, with fewer wheat fields, were less aggressive than those from other regions. Isolates obtained from west-central Ohio, surrounded by regions with high wheat production annually, were significantly more aggressive than those obtained in the remaining five regions. Isolates from the five other regions did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in aggressiveness. Races 1 and 2, and a few race 3 isolates, of P. tritici-repentis were detected in Ohio. The distribution of P. tritici-repentis races 1 and 2 was not associated with any region, although the prevalence of race 1 was three times greater than race 2. The rarer race 3 was associated with three dispersed regions. Results indicate that S. nodorum was the major wheat leaf-blotching pathogen. There were no positive or negative associations of S. nodorum and P. tritici-repentis or individual races of P. tritici-repentis in any of the tested regions, which indicates that neither pathogen can be used to predict the presence of the other. The isolated northeastern corner of Ohio appeared to contain isolates of S. nodorum with unique characteristics and potentially only one race of P. tritici-repentis, indicating that this area may be genetically isolated from the remaining tested areas of the state.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presence of S. nodorum was independent of P. tritici-repentis presence in sampled wheat regions.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Second interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
presence of S. nodorume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Second interactorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of S. nodorum was independent of the presence of P. tritici-repentis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–408 · show in text ↑
e1

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Occurrence of both wheat pathogens varied by region in one or both years.

Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume1pathogen
Second interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
occurrence of both pathogense0
Setting
regione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Second interactorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the occurrence of both pathogens varied by region in one or both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–514 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stagonospora nodorum and Pyrenophora tritici-repentis on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. nodorum isolates from northeast Ohio were less aggressive than isolates from other regions.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Outcome
less aggressivee0
Direction
less aggressivee0
Setting
northeast Ohioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. nodorum isolates obtained from northeast Ohio, with fewer wheat fields, were less aggressive than those from other regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–802 · show in text ↑
e1

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. nodorum isolates from west-central Ohio were significantly more aggressive than isolates from the five remaining regions.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume1pathogen
Outcome
more aggressivee0
Direction
more aggressivee0
Comparator
remaining five regionse0
Setting
west-central Ohioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates obtained from west-central Ohio, surrounded by regions with high wheat production annually, were significantly more aggressive than those obtained in the remaining five regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“The aggressiveness of S. nodorum isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. nodorum isolates from the other five regions did not differ significantly in aggressiveness.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume1pathogen
Outcome
aggressivenesse0
Direction
did not differe0
Setting
five other regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates from the five other regions did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in aggressiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“The aggressiveness of S. nodorum isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–557 · show in text ↑
e2

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Races 1, 2, and a few race 3 isolates of P. tritici-repentis were detected in Ohio.

Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
Races 1 and 2, and a few race 3 isolates, of P. tritici-repentis were detectede0
Setting
Ohioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Races 1 and 2, and a few race 3 isolates, of P. tritici-repentis were detected in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. tritici-repentis races 1 and 2 were not associated with a region.

Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
distribution of P. tritici-repentis races 1 and 2e0
Setting
regione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution of P. tritici-repentis races 1 and 2 was not associated with any region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1263 · show in text ↑
e1

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Race 1 prevalence was three times race 2 prevalence.

Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
prevalence of race 1e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
three timese0
Comparator
race 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the prevalence of race 1 was three times greater than race 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1334 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. tritici-repentis races 1 and 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1228 · show in text ↑
e2

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rarer race 3 was associated with three dispersed regions.

Interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
race 3 was associated with three dispersed regionse0
Setting
three dispersed regionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rarer race 3 was associated with three dispersed regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1396 · show in text ↑
e1

“P. tritici-repentis races 1 and 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1228 · show in text ↑
e2

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. nodorum was the major wheat leaf blotch pathogen.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Outcome
major wheat leaf-blotching pathogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. nodorum was the major wheat leaf-blotching pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1474 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither pathogen predicted the presence of the other in tested regions.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Second interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
associations of S. nodorum and P. tritici-repentise0
Setting
tested regionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Second interactorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no positive or negative associations of S. nodorum and P. tritici-repentis or individual races of P. tritici-repentis in any of the tested regions, which indicates that neither pathogen can be used to predict the presence of the other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1721 · show in text ↑
e1

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Northeastern Ohio may be genetically isolated based on unique S. nodorum isolates and potentially one P. tritici-repentis race.

Interactor
S. nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Second interactor
P. tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise0pathogen
Outcome
unique characteristics and potentially only one race of P. tritici-repentise0
Setting
northeastern corner of Ohioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Second interactorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The isolated northeastern corner of Ohio appeared to contain isolates of S. nodorum with unique characteristics and potentially only one race of P. tritici-repentis, indicating that this area may be genetically isolated from the remaining tested areas of the state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1987 · show in text ↑
e1

“on wheat in Ohio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–112 · show in text ↑