Paper · 1985 · Peanut Science

Row Pattern and Weed Management Effects on Peanut Production1

Daniel L. Colvin; Robert H. Walker; Michael G. Patterson; et al.

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted from 1981 through 1983 on a Dothan sandy loam (Plinthic Paleudults) at Headland, Alabama, to investigate the effects of row patterns and weed management systems on weed control, peanut yield, and net returns to land and management. Treatments consisted of three row patterns, a) conventional 91-cm rows, b) dual twin 18-cm rows, and c) triple twin 18-cm rows, and six weed management systems ranging from none to various combinations of herbicide and mechanical inputs. The experimental area was naturally infested with bristly starbur (Acanthospermum hispidum DC), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L.), Florida beggarweed [Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC.], large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], and Texas panicum (Panicum texanum Buckl.). Results showed that weed control was affected somewhat by row patterns with broadleaf weeds being more responsive to row pattern manipulation than grass weeds. Weed fresh weights were generally lower as row patterns narrowed from conventional 91-cm spacing, however exceptions did occur. Highest yields and net returns were obtained when peanuts were planted in the dual twin 18-cm rows and weed management included benefin applied preplant incorporated, plus alachlor applied preemergence, and two timely cultivations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row pattern affected weed control, with broadleaf weeds more responsive than grasses.

Treatment
row patternse0
Outcome
broadleaf weedse0
Direction
more responsivee0
Comparator
grass weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed control was affected somewhat by row patterns with broadleaf weeds being more responsive to row pattern manipulation than grass weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed fresh weights generally fell as rows narrowed from 91 cm, with exceptions.

Treatment
row patterns narrowede0
Outcome
Weed fresh weightse0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
exceptions did occure0
Comparator
conventional 91-cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed fresh weights were generally lower as row patterns narrowed from conventional 91-cm spacing, however exceptions did occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual twin rows plus benefin, alachlor and two cultivations produced the highest peanut yields.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
dual twin 18-cm rows and weed management included benefin applied preplant incorporated, plus alachlor applied preemergence, and two timely cultivationse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields and net returns were obtained when peanuts were planted in the dual twin 18-cm rows and weed management included benefin applied preplant incorporated, plus alachlor applied preemergence, and two timely cultivations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same dual twin row and weed program produced the highest net returns.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
dual twin 18-cm rows and weed management included benefin applied preplant incorporated, plus alachlor applied preemergence, and two timely cultivationse0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields and net returns were obtained when peanuts were planted in the dual twin 18-cm rows and weed management included benefin applied preplant incorporated, plus alachlor applied preemergence, and two timely cultivations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1309 · show in text ↑

alachlor · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

benfluralin · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

226 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.