Paper · 1974 · PANS Pest Articles & News Summaries

Chemical Weed Control in Cassava using Paraquat

R. S. Harper

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Paraquat applied as a directed inter-row spray gave economical control of weeds in cassava for a period of three months or more. Applications were made at rates of 0.2–0.4 kg/ha post-emergence in young cassava of 3 months or more with 15–20 cm of brown bark at the base of the stems; a repeat application was made after an interval of 10–14 days. Usually, one further spray was required to obtain acceptable weed control until harvesting, weed control being facilitated by the increased shade given by the developing crop canopy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat applied as a directed inter-row spray gave economical weed control in cassava for three months or more.

Treatment
Paraquat applied as a directed inter-row spraye0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
control of weedse0
Qualifier
for a period of three months or moree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Paraquat applied as a directed inter-row spray gave economical control of weeds in cassava for a period of three months or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Usually one further spray was required to obtain acceptable weed control until harvesting.

Treatment
one further spraye0
Outcome
acceptable weed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“one further spray was required to obtain acceptable weed control until harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–446 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control was facilitated by the increased shade of the developing crop canopy.

Outcome
weed controle0
Qualifier
increased shade given by the developing crop canopye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“weed control being facilitated by the increased shade given by the developing crop canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–537 · show in text ↑

paraquat · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · weed · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.