Paper · 1990 · Tropical Pest Management

Spatial distribution of key pests of mustard and their natural enemies in India

R. P. Shukla

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In a field study of the spatial distribution of the pests of mustard, Brassica campestris; Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenback) and Athalia proxima Klug. and predator Coccinella septumpunctata Linn. attack on Lipaphis erysimi at Shillong, Meghalaya in 1984–1985. Various statistical parameters were calculated for each set of observation. L. erysimi on leaf, shoot, inflorescence and pod and A. proxima larvae on plants followed the negative binomial while the predator C. septumpunctata on L. erysimi and the larvae of A. proxima on leaves followed a positive binomial distribution. These parameters will be used to develop sequential sampling plans and economic injury levels for mustard pests. An interesting predator‐prey relationship, where the host is overdispersed and the predator is underdispersed was found, suggesting that this predator can be successfully used to control the aphid population.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipaphis erysimi on mustard leaves, shoots, inflorescences and pods followed a negative binomial distribution.

Taxon
mustardt0
Interactor
L. erysimiLipaphis erysimie0pest
Outcome
L. erysimi on leaf, shoot, inflorescence and pode0
Qualifier
negative binomiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“L. erysimi on leaf, shoot, inflorescence and pod and A. proxima larvae on plants followed the negative binomial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Athalia proxima larvae on mustard plants followed a negative binomial distribution.

Taxon
mustardt0
Interactor
A. proximaAthalia proximae0pest
Outcome
A. proxima larvae on plantse0
Qualifier
negative binomiale0

Verbatim

e0

“A. proxima larvae on plants followed the negative binomial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coccinella septumpunctata attacking Lipaphis erysimi followed a positive binomial distribution.

Taxon
mustardt0
Interactor
L. erysimiLipaphis erysimie0pest
Second interactor
C. septumpunctatae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predator C. septumpunctata on L. erysimie0
Qualifier
positive binomial distributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the predator C. septumpunctata on L. erysimi and the larvae of A. proxima on leaves followed a positive binomial distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Athalia proxima larvae on mustard leaves followed a positive binomial distribution.

Taxon
mustardt0
Interactor
A. proximaAthalia proximae0pest
Outcome
larvae of A. proxima on leavese0
Qualifier
positive binomial distributione0

Verbatim

e0

“the larvae of A. proxima on leaves followed a positive binomial distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The aphid was overdispersed while its predator was underdispersed.

Taxon
mustardt0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimit1pest
Second interactor
Coccinella septumpunctatat1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
host is overdispersed and the predator is underdispersede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the host is overdispersed and the predator is underdispersed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑
t1

“Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenback) and Athalia proxima Klug. and predator Coccinella septumpunctata Linn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–200 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the predator can control the aphid population.

Taxon
mustardt0
Outcome
predator can be successfully used to control the aphid populatione0

Verbatim

e0

“this predator can be successfully used to control the aphid population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44 · show in text ↑