Paper · 2010 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Harvest hard red spring wheat

S L Fox; T F Townley-Smith; J B Thomas; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Harvest is a hard red spring wheat that meets the end-use quality specifications of the Canada Western Red Spring wheat class. Harvest is adapted to the wheat growing regions of the Canadian prairies based on data from the Central Bread Wheat Cooperative Registration Test conducted in 1998, 1999 and 2000 and grown in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The overall grain yield of Harvest was significantly higher compared with the check cultivars Neepawa, Roblin, AC Majestic and AC Barrie, but yielded significantly less than the check cultivar McKenzie. Harvest matured similar to McKenzie and Neepawa, 1 d later than Roblin, 1 d earlier than AC Barrie and significantly earlier than AC Majestic. Harvest was significantly shorter than the check cultivars and had the lowest lodging scores. The test weight of Harvest was similar to McKenzie and AC Barrie and significantly higher than Neepawa, Roblin and AC Majestic. Harvest demonstrated moderate resistance to leaf rust and loose smut and very good resistance to stem rust. Resistance to common bunt was fair, similar to Neepawa and AC Barrie. Resistance to Fusarium head blight was similar to the susceptible check Roblin and poorer than the other checks. Harvest had very good preharvest sprouting resistance with lower sprouting scores than the best check in 2 of 3 years of testing, and it maintained its falling numbers after natural or artificial weathering of spikes. End-use quality tests indicated that Harvest was within the range of the checks for most end-use quality traits. Key words: Triticum aestivum L., cultivar description, red spring wheat, sprouting resistance

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest yielded significantly higher grain than the check cultivars Neepawa, Roblin, AC Majestic and AC Barrie.

Material
Harveste1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
check cultivars Neepawa, Roblin, AC Majestic and AC Barriee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The overall grain yield of Harvest was significantly higher compared with the check cultivars Neepawa, Roblin, AC Majestic and AC Barrie, but yielded significantly less than the check cultivar McKenzie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest yielded significantly less grain than the check cultivar McKenzie.

Material
Harveste1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
significantly lesse1
Comparator
check cultivar McKenziee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The overall grain yield of Harvest was significantly higher compared with the check cultivars Neepawa, Roblin, AC Majestic and AC Barrie, but yielded significantly less than the check cultivar McKenzie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest matured at the same time as McKenzie and Neepawa.

Material
Harveste2
Outcome
maturede2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
McKenzie and Neepawae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Harvest matured similar to McKenzie and Neepawa, 1 d later than Roblin, 1 d earlier than AC Barrie and significantly earlier than AC Majestic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest matured 1 day later than Roblin.

Material
Harveste2
Outcome
maturede2
Direction
latere2
Value
1 de2
Comparator
Robline2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Harvest matured similar to McKenzie and Neepawa, 1 d later than Roblin, 1 d earlier than AC Barrie and significantly earlier than AC Majestic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest matured 1 day earlier than AC Barrie.

Material
Harveste2
Outcome
maturede2
Direction
earliere2
Value
1 de2
Comparator
AC Barriee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Harvest matured similar to McKenzie and Neepawa, 1 d later than Roblin, 1 d earlier than AC Barrie and significantly earlier than AC Majestic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest matured significantly earlier than AC Majestic.

Material
Harveste2
Outcome
maturede2
Direction
significantly earliere2
Comparator
AC Majestice2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Harvest matured similar to McKenzie and Neepawa, 1 d later than Roblin, 1 d earlier than AC Barrie and significantly earlier than AC Majestic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest was significantly shorter than the check cultivars.

Material
Harveste3
Outcome
shortere3
Direction
significantly shortere3
Comparator
check cultivarse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Harvest was significantly shorter than the check cultivars and had the lowest lodging scores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest had the lowest lodging scores among the cultivars tested.

Material
Harveste3
Outcome
lodging scorese3
Direction
loweste3
Comparator
check cultivarse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Harvest was significantly shorter than the check cultivars and had the lowest lodging scores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight of Harvest was similar to McKenzie and AC Barrie.

Material
Harveste4
Outcome
test weighte4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
McKenzie and AC Barriee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The test weight of Harvest was similar to McKenzie and AC Barrie and significantly higher than Neepawa, Roblin and AC Majestic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Test weight of Harvest was significantly higher than Neepawa, Roblin and AC Majestic.

Material
Harveste4
Outcome
test weighte4
Direction
significantly highere4
Comparator
Neepawa, Roblin and AC Majestice4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The test weight of Harvest was similar to McKenzie and AC Barrie and significantly higher than Neepawa, Roblin and AC Majestic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest has moderate resistance to leaf rust and loose smut.

Material
Harveste5
Outcome
resistance to leaf rust and loose smute5
Qualifier
moderatee5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Harvest demonstrated moderate resistance to leaf rust and loose smut and very good resistance to stem rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest has very good resistance to stem rust.

Material
Harveste5
Outcome
resistance to stem ruste5
Qualifier
very goode5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Harvest demonstrated moderate resistance to leaf rust and loose smut and very good resistance to stem rust”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance of Harvest to common bunt was fair, similar to Neepawa and AC Barrie.

Outcome
Resistance to common bunte6
Qualifier
faire6
Comparator
Neepawa and AC Barriee6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Resistance to common bunt was fair, similar to Neepawa and AC Barrie”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance of Harvest to Fusarium head blight was similar to the susceptible check Roblin.

Outcome
Resistance to Fusarium head blighte7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Comparator
susceptible check Robline7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Resistance to Fusarium head blight was similar to the susceptible check Roblin and poorer than the other checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance of Harvest to Fusarium head blight was poorer than the other checks.

Outcome
Resistance to Fusarium head blighte7
Direction
poorere7
Comparator
other checkse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Resistance to Fusarium head blight was similar to the susceptible check Roblin and poorer than the other checks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest had lower sprouting scores than the best check in 2 of 3 years of testing.

Material
Harveste7
Outcome
sprouting scorese7
Direction
lowere7
Qualifier
2 of 3 years of testinge7
Comparator
best checke7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Harvest had very good preharvest sprouting resistance with lower sprouting scores than the best check in 2 of 3 years of testing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest has very good preharvest sprouting resistance.

Material
Harveste7
Outcome
preharvest sprouting resistancee7
Qualifier
very goode7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Harvest had very good preharvest sprouting resistance with lower sprouting scores than the best check in 2 of 3 years of testing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest maintained its falling numbers after natural or artificial weathering of spikes.

Treatment
natural or artificial weathering of spikese6
Outcome
falling numberse6
Direction
maintainede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“it maintained its falling numbers after natural or artificial weathering of spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1339–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

End-use quality traits of Harvest were within the range of the checks for most traits.

Material
Harveste5
Outcome
end-use quality traitse5
Direction
within the rangee5
Comparator
the checkse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“End-use quality tests indicated that Harvest was within the range of the checks for most end-use quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1534 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest is adapted to the wheat growing regions of the Canadian prairies.

Material
Harveste4
Outcome
adapted to the wheat growing regions of the Canadian prairiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Harvest is adapted to the wheat growing regions of the Canadian prairies based on data from the Central Bread Wheat Cooperative Registration Test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“hard red spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–29 · show in text ↑