Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Use of a Rye Cover Crop following Corn in Rotation with Soybean in the Upper Midwest

Jason L. De Bruin; Paul M. Porter; Nicholas R. Jordan

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
98
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

There is a need for improved soil and water conservation in the corn ( Zea mays L.)–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation common to the upper Midwest, and an appropriate cover crop may fulfill this need. A corn–soybean rotation that included a rye ( Secale cereale L.) cover crop was studied at two Minnesota locations in 2002 and 2003 to evaluate rye management method and timing for no‐till soybean production. Fall‐planted rye following corn harvest at Waseca and Rosemount was managed the next spring by: (i) mowing once, (ii) mowing twice, (iii) applying glyphosate herbicide once, (iv) applying herbicide twice, and (v) mowing once followed by applying herbicide, with four mow dates beginning 1 May separated by approximately 1 wk. Rye regrowth after mowing but before stem elongation in early to mid‐May was similar to that of uncut rye but decreased dramatically when mowed at anthesis in early June. At Rosemount, low weed populations and the presence of the rye cover crop, when properly managed, had only a minimal affect on soybean yield, resulting in the one‐pass mowing system being equally profitable as the no‐rye two‐pass herbicide system. At Waseca, where weed pressure was high, the rye cover crop treatments without subsequent herbicide application as well as the early one‐pass herbicide applications did not provide adequate control, making these systems less profitable. Our research indicated soybean yields following a rye cover crop were often comparable to yields where no rye cover crop was grown, but economic returns were usually reduced.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye regrowth after mowing before stem elongation was similar to uncut rye.

Treatment
mowing but before stem elongation in early to mid‐Maye0
Outcome
Rye regrowthe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
uncut ryee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rye regrowth after mowing but before stem elongation in early to mid‐May was similar to that of uncut rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye regrowth decreased sharply when mowed at anthesis in early June.

Treatment
mowed at anthesis in early Junee0
Direction
decreased dramaticallye0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased dramatically when mowed at anthesis in early June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Rosemount, a properly managed rye cover crop had only a minimal effect on soybean yield under low weed pressure.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
rye cover crope0
Interactor
ryeSecale cerealee0weed
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
minimal affecte0
Qualifier
low weed populationse0
Setting
Rosemounte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Secale cereale
Secale cereale · InteractorLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Rosemount, low weed populations and the presence of the rye cover crop, when properly managed, had only a minimal affect on soybean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Rosemount, one-pass mowing with rye was as profitable as a no-rye two-pass herbicide system.

Treatment
one‐pass mowing systeme0
Outcome
profitablee0
Direction
equallye0
Comparator
no‐rye two‐pass herbicide systeme0
Setting
Rosemounte1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the one‐pass mowing system being equally profitable as the no‐rye two‐pass herbicide system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1161 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Rosemount”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Waseca, rye treatments without subsequent herbicide and early one-pass herbicide treatments failed to control weeds adequately.

Treatment
rye cover crop treatments without subsequent herbicide application as well as the early one‐pass herbicide applicationse0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
did not provide adequatee0
Setting
Wasecae0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At Waseca, where weed pressure was high, the rye cover crop treatments without subsequent herbicide application as well as the early one‐pass herbicide applications did not provide adequate control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The poorly controlling rye management systems at Waseca were less profitable.

Outcome
profitablee0
Direction
lesse0
Setting
Wasecae1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“making these systems less profitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Waseca, where weed pressure was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yields after a rye cover crop were often comparable to yields without rye.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
rye cover crope0
Outcome
soybean yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
no rye cover crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soybean yields following a rye cover crop were often comparable to yields where no rye cover crop was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic returns were usually lower after the rye cover crop.

Outcome
economic returnse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“economic returns were usually reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1573 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 33 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

cover crop · Secale cereale · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pruning · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.