Paper · 2003 · Journal of Ecology

Temporal variability in water supply controls seedling diversity in limestone pavement microcosms

Jeremy T. Lundholm; Douglas W. Larson

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
19
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1 Environmental fluctuations can hypothetically promote greater species diversity, but this has rarely been experimentally tested in plant communities. We predicted that high temporal variability in soil moisture would promote high diversity in a community of recruiting seedlings. Using a glasshouse experiment designed to imitate field conditions in species-rich limestone pavement habitats, we examined the effects of temporal variability and total quantity of water provided on seedling species richness, evenness and composition within a single growing season. 2 Temporal variability was altered by varying the frequency at which water was added while keeping the total quantity of water constant. Low temporal variability was created by high frequencies of water addition. High variability was associated with more extreme fluctuations between droughted and flooded conditions. Each of three variability treatments was carried out using three total quantities of water added to create a gradient in total soil water availability. 3 Species richness was greatest in higher quantity and lower variability treatments. Higher total quantities of water added buffered the negative effects of higher temporal variability, and lower temporal variability buffered the negative effects of lower quantity. Species richness was negatively correlated with temporal variability in soil moisture content both in the glasshouse and in a field study. Evenness was negatively correlated with richness. Low richness, high evenness communities had low densities and were prone to extinction. Thus, neither richness nor evenness was maintained by higher temporal variabilities within a growing season. 4 Lower species richness under more temporally variable conditions was attributable to both random extinctions due to reductions in total community density and species-specific differences in mortality. Final species relative abundances differed between water treatments, but there were no separate effects of variability in soil moisture content or total quantity of water added. Upland species were more abundant in treatments where drought was more prevalent, either due to low total quantities of water or high temporal variability in soil moisture. Spatial heterogeneity in moisture supply, or interannual fluctuations between dry and wet years, may thus contribute to coexistence of drought-tolerant and flood-tolerant species in the field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species richness was greatest with more water and lower temporal variability.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Treatment
higher quantity and lower variability treatmentse0
Outcome
Species richnesse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Species richness was greatest in higher quantity and lower variability treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher water quantity buffered the negative richness effect of temporal variability.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Treatment
Higher total quantities of water addede0
Outcome
negative effectse0
Direction
bufferede0
Comparator
higher temporal variabilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher total quantities of water added buffered the negative effects of higher temporal variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower temporal variability buffered the negative effect of lower water quantity.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Treatment
lower temporal variabilitye0
Outcome
negative effectse0
Direction
bufferede0
Comparator
lower quantitye0

Verbatim

e0

“lower temporal variability buffered the negative effects of lower quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Richness declined as temporal variability of soil moisture rose in glasshouse and field studies.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Treatment
temporal variability in soil moisture contente0
Outcome
Species richnesse0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Setting
glasshousee0

Verbatim

e0

“Species richness was negatively correlated with temporal variability in soil moisture content both in the glasshouse and in a field study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evenness was negatively correlated with richness.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Outcome
Evennesse0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Comparator
richnesse0

Verbatim

e0

“Evenness was negatively correlated with richness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-richness, high-evenness communities had low densities and were prone to extinction.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Outcome
low densities and were prone to extinctione0

Verbatim

e0

“Low richness, high evenness communities had low densities and were prone to extinction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1491–1577 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower richness under greater temporal variability was attributed to random extinction from lower community density.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Outcome
Lower species richnesse0
Qualifier
random extinctions due to reductions in total community densitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Lower species richness under more temporally variable conditions was attributable to both random extinctions due to reductions in total community density and species-specific differences in mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1889 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower richness under greater temporal variability was also attributed to species-specific mortality.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Outcome
Lower species richnesse0
Qualifier
species-specific differences in mortalitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Lower species richness under more temporally variable conditions was attributable to both random extinctions due to reductions in total community density and species-specific differences in mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1889 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final relative abundances differed among water treatments.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Treatment
water treatmentse0
Outcome
Final species relative abundancese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Final species relative abundances differed between water treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–1958 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variability and total water quantity had no separate effect on final relative abundances.

Taxon
seedlingt0
Treatment
variability in soil moisture content or total quantity of water addede0
Outcome
separate effectse0
Direction
no separate effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there were no separate effects of variability in soil moisture content or total quantity of water added”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1964–2067 · show in text ↑
t0

“seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Upland species were more abundant with more prevalent drought.

Taxon
Upland speciese0
Treatment
treatments where drought was more prevalente0
Outcome
Upland speciese0
Direction
more abundante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Upland species were more abundant in treatments where drought was more prevalent, either due to low total quantities of water or high temporal variability in soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2069–2240 · show in text ↑